Seek Returns logo

CP vs. TRN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CP and TRN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCPTRN
Company NameCanadian Pacific Kansas City LimitedTrinity Industries, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationMachinery
Market Capitalization68.69 billion USD2.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 30, 1983May 3, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CP and TRN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CP vs. TRN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPTRN
5-Day Price Return0.70%0.79%
13-Week Price Return-3.46%3.81%
26-Week Price Return-1.02%-4.53%
52-Week Price Return-10.39%-18.42%
Month-to-Date Return-0.92%-1.34%
Year-to-Date Return-0.41%-20.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.01M0.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.57M0.65M
3-Month Volatility20.33%34.10%
Beta0.601.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CP

8.97%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

CP’s Return on Equity of 8.97% is on par with the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TRN

9.24%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

TRN’s Return on Equity of 9.24% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CP

28.04%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.04% places CP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TRN

3.83%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, TRN’s Net Profit Margin of 3.83% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CP

36.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 36.35% places CP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TRN

17.05%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.05% places TRN in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPTRN
Return on Equity (TTM)8.97%9.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.87%1.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.04%3.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)36.35%17.05%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)85.09%23.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CP

0.93

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

CP’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TRN

1.96

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

TRN’s Current Ratio of 1.96 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CP

0.48

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, CP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TRN

5.80

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 5.80, TRN operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CP

6.97

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

CP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TRN

1.81

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, TRN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.81 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPTRN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.931.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.811.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.485.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.971.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

CP vs. TRN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CP vs. TRN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CP

0.78%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

CP’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TRN

4.27%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.27%, TRN offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Machinery industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CP

17.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

CP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.72% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TRN

99.90%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

TRN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 99.90% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPTRN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.78%4.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)17.72%99.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CP

22.75

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

CP’s P/E Ratio of 22.75 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TRN

23.39

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

TRN’s P/E Ratio of 23.39 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CP

6.38

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 6.38, CP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TRN

0.90

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, TRN’s P/S Ratio of 0.90 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CP

2.18

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

CP’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Ground Transportation industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TRN

2.18

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

TRN’s P/B Ratio of 2.18 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CP vs. TRN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPTRN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.7523.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.380.90
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.182.18
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.0415.57