Seek Returns

COO vs. PHG: Cooper vs. Koninklijke Philips Stock Comparison

How do Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) both belong to the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, though COO is classified under Health Care Supplies while PHG falls under Health Care Equipment.

Cooper (COO) trades as ordinary local shares, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
Profile ItemCOOPHG
NameThe Cooper Companies, Inc.Koninklijke Philips N.V. ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS Industry GroupHealth Care Equipment & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
GICS Sub-IndustryHealth Care SuppliesHealth Care Equipment
Market Capitalization11.86 billion USD29.67 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 21, 1983March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COO
PHG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCOOPHG
Total Return (1Y)-9.72%13.15%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-8.06%18.95%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-10.20%-6.38%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COO
PHG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCOOPHG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)32.67%29.55%
Beta (5Y)0.790.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-52.11%-74.51%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.47M1.08M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
COO and PHG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCOOPHG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.430.30
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.590.48

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cooper (COO) at 6.84% and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 8.61% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

6.84%

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
COO
6.84%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

8.61%

Max
47.61%
Q3
14.36%
PHG
8.61%
Median
5.45%
Q1
-10.67%
Min
-47.01%
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their ROE against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Cooper (COO) at 13.46% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 5.39%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

13.46%

Max
29.35%
COO
13.46%
Q3
9.33%
Median
2.18%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

5.39%

Max
29.35%
Q3
9.33%
PHG
5.39%
Median
2.18%
Q1
-6.29%
Min
-28.46%
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their net margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Cooper (COO) at 20.82% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 3.76%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

20.82%

Max
35.43%
COO
20.82%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

3.76%

Max
35.43%
Q3
14.14%
Median
6.81%
PHG
3.76%
Q1
-0.28%
Min
-16.29%
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCOOPHG
ROE (TTM)6.84%8.61%
ROA (TTM)2.74%3.59%
Net Margin (TTM)13.46%5.39%
Operating Margin (TTM)20.82%3.76%
Gross Margin (TTM)65.93%46.43%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cooper (COO) at 5.06% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at -1.04% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Cooper (COO) reports EPS growth of -4.59%, ranked against its industry; Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCOOPHG
Revenue Growth (YoY)5.06%-1.04%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)7.35%0.01%
EPS Growth (YoY)-4.59%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-1.22%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Cooper (COO) at 1.22 and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.33 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.22

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
COO
1.22
Min
0.30

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.33

Max
7.59
Q3
4.00
Median
1.98
Q1
1.37
PHG
1.33
Min
0.30
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Cooper (COO) at 0.34 and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 0.70 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.34

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
Median
0.58
COO
0.34
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.70

Max
1.88
Q3
0.91
PHG
0.70
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCOOPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.33
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.340.70
Net Debt / EBITDA2.842.45

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Neither Cooper (COO) nor Koninklijke Philips (PHG) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

COO
0.00%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

PHG
0.00%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 211.79%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; Cooper (COO) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

0.00%

COO
0.00%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

211.79%

PHG
211.79%
Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCOOPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%211.79%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Cooper (COO) at 21.43 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 63.23 sits in the richer quartile — PHG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

21.43

Max
80.41
Q3
47.62
Median
29.93
COO
21.43
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

63.23

Max
80.41
PHG
63.23
Q3
47.62
Median
29.93
Q1
21.19
Min
4.21
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Cooper (COO) at 2.80 and Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 1.67 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

2.80

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
COO
2.80
Median
2.13
Q1
1.10
Min
0.03

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.67

Max
8.80
Q3
4.32
Median
2.13
PHG
1.67
Q1
1.10
Min
0.03
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Cooper (COO) at 1.42 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Koninklijke Philips (PHG) at 2.28 is valued near its industry’s middle — COO is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

COO

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

1.42

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
Q1
1.73
COO
1.42
Min
-1.31

PHG

Health Care Equipment & Services industry group

2.28

Max
11.68
Q3
6.12
Median
3.00
PHG
2.28
Q1
1.73
Min
-1.31
Loading chart…
Cooper (COO) vs. Koninklijke Philips (PHG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Health Care Equipment & Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cooper (COO) and Koninklijke Philips (PHG)
MetricCOOPHG
P/E Ratio (TTM)21.4363.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.801.67
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.422.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)4.58%6.23%