COIN vs. OWL: Coinbase Global vs. Blue Owl Capital Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Coinbase Global (COIN) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though COIN is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while OWL falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Coinbase Global (COIN) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.33, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Blue Owl Capital (OWL) is closer to market-like at 1.28 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Coinbase Global (COIN) reports a negative ROE of -4.68%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports 6.41%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Coinbase Global (COIN) reports a negative net margin of -12.89%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports 3.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Coinbase Global (COIN) reports a negative operating margin of -1.42%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports 31.15%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Coinbase Global (COIN) at 9.40% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 25.04% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Coinbase Global (COIN) at -53.06% and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at -50.00% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Coinbase Global (COIN) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Coinbase Global (COIN) in Financial Services and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Coinbase Global (COIN) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports a yield of 9.66%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Blue Owl Capital (OWL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 650.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; Coinbase Global (COIN) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Blue Owl Capital (OWL) trades at 70.14 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Coinbase Global (COIN) has no P/E ratio this period.

Both Coinbase Global (COIN) at 6.56 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 5.04 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

On P/B ratio, both Coinbase Global (COIN) at 2.56 and Blue Owl Capital (OWL) at 3.54 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics