Seek Returns

CNP vs. KEP: CenterPoint Energy vs. Korea Electric Power Stock Comparison

How do CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but CNP is classified in Multi-Utilities while KEP is classified in Electric Utilities.

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) trades as ordinary local shares, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
Profile ItemCNPKEP
NameCenterPoint Energy, Inc.Korea Electric Power Corporation Sponsored ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesSouth Korea
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS Industry GroupUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectric Utilities
GICS Sub-IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization26.95 billion USD14.38 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 27, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CNP
KEP
GSPC
Loading price history…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricCNPKEP
Total Return (1Y)5.91%-25.98%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)18.08%20.85%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)11.79%2.90%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CNP
KEP
GSPC
Loading price history…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricCNPKEP
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)18.24%46.68%
Beta (5Y)0.440.97
Max Drawdown (5Y)-22.81%-55.55%
Avg. Volume (3M)6.95M949.70K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CNP and KEP are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricCNPKEP
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.09-0.65
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.12-0.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 16.60% sits in the top ROE quartile, while CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 10.14% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for KEP.

CNP

Utilities industry group

10.14%

Max
17.99%
Q3
12.01%
CNP
10.14%
Median
9.44%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%

KEP

Utilities industry group

16.60%

Max
17.99%
KEP
16.60%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their ROE against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 11.76% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 8.04% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

CNP

Utilities industry group

11.76%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
CNP
11.76%
Q1
9.18%
Min
-0.20%

KEP

Utilities industry group

8.04%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
Q1
9.18%
KEP
8.04%
Min
-0.20%
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their net margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 30.26% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.73% operates in the bottom quartile.

CNP

Utilities industry group

30.26%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
CNP
30.26%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
Min
-4.90%

KEP

Utilities industry group

4.73%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
KEP
4.73%
Min
-4.90%
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their operating margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricCNPKEP
ROE (TTM)10.14%16.60%
ROA (TTM)3.15%3.04%
Net Margin (TTM)11.76%8.04%
Operating Margin (TTM)30.26%4.73%
Gross Margin (TTM)48.39%15.97%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 8.26% and Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 144.73% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 1.27%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricCNPKEP
Revenue Growth (YoY)8.26%4.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)0.13%11.03%
EPS Growth (YoY)1.27%144.73%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)0.21%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 1.15 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.44 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for KEP.

CNP

Utilities industry group

1.15

Max
1.90
Q3
1.17
CNP
1.15
Median
0.88
Q1
0.66
Min
0.29

KEP

Utilities industry group

0.44

Max
1.90
Q3
1.17
Median
0.88
Q1
0.66
KEP
0.44
Min
0.29
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their current ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 2.12 and Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.63 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.

CNP

Utilities industry group

2.12

Max
2.63
CNP
2.12
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00

KEP

Utilities industry group

2.63

KEP
2.63
Max
2.63
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricCNPKEP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.150.44
Debt / Equity (MRQ)2.122.63
Net Debt / EBITDA5.985.13

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 2.30% pays an industry-typical yield; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 13,891.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

CNP

Utilities industry group

2.30%

Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
Median
2.85%
CNP
2.30%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

KEP

Utilities industry group

13,891.89%

KEP
13,891.89%
Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
Median
2.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 52.87% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 12.22% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.

CNP

Utilities industry group

52.87%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
Median
56.38%
CNP
52.87%
Q1
32.38%
Min
0.00%

KEP

Utilities industry group

12.22%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
Median
56.38%
Q1
32.38%
KEP
12.22%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricCNPKEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%13,891.89%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)52.87%12.22%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.66 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 23.37 sits in the richer quartile — the market is paying very different prices for each company’s trailing earnings.

CNP

Utilities industry group

23.37

Max
31.22
CNP
23.37
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
Q1
15.17
Min
3.34

KEP

Utilities industry group

2.66

Max
31.22
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
Q1
15.17
Min
3.34
KEP
2.66
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 2.74 prices around its industry’s middle — KEP costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

CNP

Utilities industry group

2.74

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
CNP
2.74
Median
2.63
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

KEP

Utilities industry group

0.00

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
Q1
1.52
KEP
0.00
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.38 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while CenterPoint Energy (CNP) at 2.30 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

CNP

Utilities industry group

2.30

Max
3.12
CNP
2.30
Q3
2.21
Median
1.83
Q1
1.46
Min
0.34

KEP

Utilities industry group

0.38

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
Median
1.83
Q1
1.46
KEP
0.38
Min
0.34
Loading chart…
CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for CenterPoint Energy (CNP) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricCNPKEP
P/E Ratio (TTM)23.372.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.740.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.300.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)-18.50%4,799.31%