Seek Returns logo

CNH vs. LTM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNH and LTM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CNH is a standard domestic listing, while LTM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCNHLTM
Company NameCNH Industrial N.V.--
CountryUnited KingdomChile
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization13.36 billion USD13.12 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 30, 2013July 25, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and LTM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. LTM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNHLTM
5-Day Price Return-1.48%-4.04%
13-Week Price Return-21.99%5.53%
26-Week Price Return-5.24%35.95%
52-Week Price Return-3.70%64.89%
Month-to-Date Return-1.57%-6.54%
Year-to-Date Return-5.74%48.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.18M4,791.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume15.78M2,531.29M
3-Month Volatility26.43%32.13%
Beta1.330.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

10.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LTM

141.28%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
27.29%
Median
16.68%
Q1
8.40%
Min
-15.23%

LTM’s Return on Equity of 141.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

4.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.55% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LTM

8.88%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
16.00%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.35%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-4.22%

LTM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

17.85%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.85% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LTM

14.24%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.67%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.63%
Min
-2.30%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.24% places LTM in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNHLTM
Return on Equity (TTM)10.67%141.28%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.91%7.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.55%8.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.85%14.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.40%27.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.24

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.24 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LTM

0.60

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.91
Median
0.73
Q1
0.54
Min
0.18

LTM’s Current Ratio of 0.60 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.55, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LTM

8.22

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
10.23
Q3
5.04
Median
1.27
Q1
0.82
Min
0.00

LTM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Passenger Airlines industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.22. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LTM

2.97

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
17.27
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LTM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNHLTM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.240.60
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.450.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.558.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.932.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. LTM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. LTM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.49%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.49% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LTM

2.40%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
7.04%
Q3
3.76%
Median
1.72%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

40.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.58% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LTM

49.16%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
99.73%
Q3
50.30%
Median
23.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LTM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.16% is within the typical range for the Passenger Airlines industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNHLTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.49%2.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.58%49.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

16.30

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/E Ratio of 16.30 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LTM

10.44

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
18.74
Q3
11.24
Median
8.33
Q1
6.11
Min
2.97

LTM’s P/E Ratio of 10.44 is within the middle range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.74

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LTM

0.93

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.07
Q3
0.73
Median
0.62
Q1
0.40
Min
0.09

LTM’s P/S Ratio of 0.93 is in the upper echelon for the Passenger Airlines industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LTM

12.98

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.47
Q3
3.19
Median
1.94
Q1
1.28
Min
0.50

At 12.98, LTM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Passenger Airlines industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CNH vs. LTM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNHLTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.3010.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.740.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.1012.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.009.02