Seek Returns logo

CNH vs. CSL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNH and CSL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNHCSL
Company NameCNH Industrial N.V.Carlisle Companies Incorporated
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryBuilding Products
Market Capitalization13.36 billion USD14.11 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 30, 2013February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and CSL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. CSL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNHCSL
5-Day Price Return-1.48%-0.55%
13-Week Price Return-21.99%-19.98%
26-Week Price Return-5.24%0.93%
52-Week Price Return-3.70%-29.19%
Month-to-Date Return-1.57%0.36%
Year-to-Date Return-5.74%-10.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.18M0.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume15.78M0.50M
3-Month Volatility26.43%43.87%
Beta1.330.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

10.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

4.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.55% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

17.85%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.85% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNHCSL
Return on Equity (TTM)10.67%33.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.91%13.86%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.55%16.12%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.85%21.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.40%36.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.24

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.24 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.55, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNHCSL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.242.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.451.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.550.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.9386.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. CSL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. CSL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.49%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.49% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSL

1.27%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.27% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

40.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.58% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNHCSL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.49%1.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.58%22.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

16.30

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/E Ratio of 16.30 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CSL

17.47

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 17.47 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.74

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CSL

2.82

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 2.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CNH vs. CSL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNHCSL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.3017.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.742.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.107.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.0015.90