Seek Returns logo

CMS vs. TLN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMS and TLN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMSTLN
Company NameCMS Energy CorporationTalen Energy Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
Market Capitalization22.57 billion USD17.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973June 2, 2023
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMS and TLN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMS vs. TLN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMSTLN
5-Day Price Return-0.51%-8.31%
13-Week Price Return3.37%-4.47%
26-Week Price Return8.24%49.71%
52-Week Price Return10.46%74.76%
Month-to-Date Return1.24%-9.72%
Year-to-Date Return11.72%79.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.74M0.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.34M1.06M
3-Month Volatility13.96%41.27%
Beta0.481.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMS

12.38%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
20.00%
Q3
13.72%
Median
9.49%
Q1
7.74%
Min
-0.57%

CMS’s Return on Equity of 12.38% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TLN

17.11%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
25.91%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.39%
Q1
4.74%
Min
-8.56%

In the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, TLN’s Return on Equity of 17.11% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

13.23%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
22.58%
Q3
14.93%
Median
9.68%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-1.14%

CMS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TLN

9.83%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
23.58%
Q3
14.86%
Median
11.17%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-2.06%

TLN’s Net Profit Margin of 9.83% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

23.08%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
45.31%
Q3
26.29%
Median
19.25%
Q1
7.66%
Min
-0.18%

CMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TLN

10.40%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
34.36%
Q3
24.29%
Median
14.23%
Q1
10.71%
Min
4.97%

TLN’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.40% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMSTLN
Return on Equity (TTM)12.38%17.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.83%3.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.23%9.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.08%10.40%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.86%63.64%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

0.90

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.23
Q3
1.11
Median
0.93
Q1
0.87
Min
0.51

CMS’s Current Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TLN

2.29

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
1.27
Median
0.78
Q1
0.66
Min
0.37

TLN’s Current Ratio of 2.29 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.04

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
3.16
Q3
2.03
Median
1.56
Q1
1.21
Min
0.58

CMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Multi-Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.04. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TLN

2.03

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
4.11
Q3
2.70
Median
1.78
Q1
1.07
Min
0.18

TLN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.03 is typical for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.73

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
9.98
Q3
5.96
Median
3.48
Q1
2.74
Min
0.59

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.73 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TLN

28.78

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
6.97
Median
2.59
Q1
1.35
Min
-1.62

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 28.78, TLN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMSTLN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.902.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.571.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.042.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.7328.78

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMS vs. TLN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMS vs. TLN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMS

2.89%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
6.29%
Q3
4.88%
Median
3.66%
Q1
2.95%
Min
1.67%

CMS’s Dividend Yield of 2.89% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TLN

0.00%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
8.60%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.40%
Q1
1.95%
Min
0.00%

TLN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMS

62.27%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
110.63%
Q3
96.69%
Median
74.83%
Q1
57.12%
Min
31.93%

CMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 62.27% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TLN

0.00%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
127.17%
Q3
82.67%
Median
41.34%
Q1
23.02%
Min
0.00%

TLN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMSTLN
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.89%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)62.27%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMS

21.54

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
29.37
Q3
20.20
Median
17.94
Q1
10.63
Min
5.90

A P/E Ratio of 21.54 places CMS in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TLN

74.53

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
43.83
Q3
23.74
Median
11.48
Q1
8.49
Min
5.02

At 74.53, TLN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.85

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
3.47
Median
2.06
Q1
0.49
Min
0.28

CMS’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TLN

7.33

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
3.80
Median
2.27
Q1
0.91
Min
0.45

TLN’s P/S Ratio of 7.33 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.47

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.71
Q3
2.22
Median
1.53
Q1
1.27
Min
0.88

CMS’s P/B Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TLN

13.23

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.68
Q3
2.10
Median
1.38
Q1
0.89
Min
0.38

At 13.23, TLN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CMS vs. TLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMSTLN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.5474.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.857.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.4713.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)163.4029.60