Seek Returns logo

CMS vs. SBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMS and SBS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CMS is a standard domestic listing, while SBS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCMSSBS
Company NameCMS Energy CorporationCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
CountryUnited StatesBrazil
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesWater Utilities
Market Capitalization21.85 billion USD15.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973May 10, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMS and SBS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMS vs. SBS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMSSBS
5-Day Price Return0.58%-3.81%
13-Week Price Return1.45%-3.43%
26-Week Price Return4.57%17.52%
52-Week Price Return9.74%16.82%
Month-to-Date Return-1.07%6.39%
Year-to-Date Return9.54%30.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.42M3.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.50M3.13M
3-Month Volatility15.37%30.98%
Beta0.410.89

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMS

12.37%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
19.69%
Q3
12.97%
Median
9.30%
Q1
7.88%
Min
4.34%

CMS’s Return on Equity of 12.37% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SBS

28.24%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
14.76%
Q3
13.44%
Median
10.08%
Q1
6.84%
Min
5.11%

SBS’s Return on Equity of 28.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Water Utilities industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

13.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
25.37%
Q3
15.24%
Median
8.50%
Q1
4.09%
Min
-1.05%

CMS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SBS

33.53%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
33.53%
Q3
23.04%
Median
13.50%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-3.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.53% places SBS in the upper quartile for the Water Utilities industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

22.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
43.73%
Q3
25.91%
Median
19.49%
Q1
8.11%
Min
-0.18%

CMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.35% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SBS

54.67%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
54.67%
Q3
39.13%
Median
31.40%
Q1
24.32%
Min
7.04%

An Operating Profit Margin of 54.67% places SBS in the upper quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMSSBS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.37%28.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.83%13.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.35%33.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.35%54.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.86%16.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

1.00

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.22
Median
0.94
Q1
0.86
Min
0.50

CMS’s Current Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SBS

1.09

Water Utilities Industry

Max
1.94
Q3
1.40
Median
1.09
Q1
0.77
Min
0.38

SBS’s Current Ratio of 1.09 aligns with the median group of the Water Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.15

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.58
Q3
1.96
Median
1.56
Q1
1.20
Min
0.53

CMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Multi-Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.15. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SBS

0.72

Water Utilities Industry

Max
5.48
Q3
3.71
Median
1.82
Q1
0.96
Min
0.58

Falling into the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry, SBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.73

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
12.21
Q3
7.03
Median
3.61
Q1
2.92
Min
1.62

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.73 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SBS

17.26

Water Utilities Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
4.65
Median
3.25
Q1
2.23
Min
0.58

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.26, SBS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Water Utilities industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMSSBS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.001.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.731.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.150.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.7317.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMS vs. SBS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMS vs. SBS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMS

3.33%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
8.75%
Q3
5.46%
Median
4.09%
Q1
2.93%
Min
0.00%

CMS’s Dividend Yield of 3.33% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SBS

1.18%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
5.64%
Q3
5.51%
Median
4.50%
Q1
2.37%
Min
0.00%

SBS’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is in the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMS

71.26%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
128.77%
Q3
97.17%
Median
66.46%
Q1
52.95%
Min
24.73%

CMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.26% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SBS

12.69%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
324.59%
Q3
254.46%
Median
142.60%
Q1
57.04%
Min
12.69%

SBS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.69% is in the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMSSBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.33%1.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.26%12.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMS

21.41

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
28.21
Q3
21.40
Median
16.89
Q1
11.54
Min
5.08

A P/E Ratio of 21.41 places CMS in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SBS

7.69

Water Utilities Industry

Max
34.48
Q3
27.82
Median
18.45
Q1
14.12
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry, SBS’s P/E Ratio of 7.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.86

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.52
Median
1.87
Q1
0.50
Min
0.27

CMS’s P/S Ratio of 2.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SBS

2.58

Water Utilities Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.76
Median
2.73
Q1
2.16
Min
1.04

SBS’s P/S Ratio of 2.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Water Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.47

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.97
Median
1.46
Q1
1.21
Min
0.86

CMS’s P/B Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SBS

1.82

Water Utilities Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
3.24
Median
1.73
Q1
1.09
Min
0.65

SBS’s P/B Ratio of 1.82 is within the conventional range for the Water Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CMS vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMSSBS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.417.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.862.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.471.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)158.7339.10