CMS vs. SBS: CMS Energy vs. Sabesp Stock Comparison
How do CMS Energy (CMS) and Sabesp (SBS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CMS Energy (CMS) and Sabesp (SBS) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but CMS is classified in Multi-Utilities while SBS is classified in Water Utilities.
CMS Energy (CMS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Sabesp (SBS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CMS Energy Corporation Common Stock | Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Brazil |
| GICS Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry Group | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry | Multi-Utilities | Water Utilities |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Multi-Utilities | Water Utilities |
| Market Capitalization | 21.70 billion USD | 16.96 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | May 10, 2002 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -1.93% | -3.72% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.79% | 28.33% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.25% | 32.85% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 17.58% | 46.80% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.76 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -28.04% | -37.59% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.84M | 11.85M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.35 | -0.17 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.49 | -0.22 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Sabesp (SBS) at 16.27% sits in the top ROE quartile, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 5.31% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.
CMS
Utilities industry group
5.31%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- CMS
- 5.31%
- Min
- 2.17%
SBS
Utilities industry group
16.27%
- Max
- 17.99%
- SBS
- 16.27%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
Net Margin (TTM)
Sabesp (SBS) at 17.52% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of CMS Energy (CMS) at 9.72%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CMS
Utilities industry group
9.72%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- CMS
- 9.72%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
SBS
Utilities industry group
17.52%
- Max
- 28.78%
- SBS
- 17.52%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both CMS Energy (CMS) at 28.45% and Sabesp (SBS) at 29.28% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CMS
Utilities industry group
28.45%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- CMS
- 28.45%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
SBS
Utilities industry group
29.28%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- SBS
- 29.28%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.31% | 16.27% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.07% | 8.08% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.72% | 17.52% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.45% | 29.28% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 40.76% | 36.96% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
CMS Energy (CMS) at 13.63% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Sabesp (SBS) at 5.39% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for CMS.
EPS Growth
CMS Energy (CMS) at 4.19% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Sabesp (SBS) at -11.79% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 13.63% | 5.39% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.22% | 19.98% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 4.19% | -11.79% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.84% | 40.65% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CMS Energy (CMS) at 0.95 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Sabesp (SBS) at 1.22 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
CMS
Utilities industry group
0.95
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- CMS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
SBS
Utilities industry group
1.22
- Max
- 1.90
- SBS
- 1.22
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Sabesp (SBS) at 0.99 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 1.96 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CMS
Utilities industry group
1.96
- Max
- 2.63
- CMS
- 1.96
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
SBS
Utilities industry group
0.99
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- SBS
- 0.99
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.95 | 1.22 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.96 | 0.99 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.33 | 2.30 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Sabesp (SBS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile CMS Energy (CMS) reports a yield of 3.21%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CMS
Utilities industry group
3.21%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CMS
- 3.21%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
SBS
Utilities industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- SBS
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Sabesp (SBS) at 35.95% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 80.45% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CMS
Utilities industry group
80.45%
- Max
- 113.04%
- CMS
- 80.45%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
SBS
Utilities industry group
35.95%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- SBS
- 35.95%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.21% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 80.45% | 35.95% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Sabesp (SBS) at 11.73 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 24.71 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
CMS
Utilities industry group
24.71
- Max
- 31.22
- CMS
- 24.71
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
SBS
Utilities industry group
11.73
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- SBS
- 11.73
- Min
- 3.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Sabesp (SBS) at 0.41 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while CMS Energy (CMS) at 2.42 prices around its industry’s middle — SBS costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CMS
Utilities industry group
2.42
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- CMS
- 2.42
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
SBS
Utilities industry group
0.41
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- SBS
- 0.41
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Sabesp (SBS) at 1.84 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 2.28 carries an above-peer premium to book — CMS is pricier on assets.
CMS
Utilities industry group
2.28
- Max
- 3.12
- CMS
- 2.28
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
SBS
Utilities industry group
1.84
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- SBS
- 1.84
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CMS | SBS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.71 | 11.73 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.42 | 0.41 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.28 | 1.84 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -9.54% | -62.11% |