Seek Returns logo

CMS vs. LNT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMS and LNT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMSLNT
Company NameCMS Energy CorporationAlliant Energy Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization21.99 billion USD16.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMS and LNT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMS vs. LNT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMSLNT
5-Day Price Return-1.44%-1.13%
13-Week Price Return4.82%9.83%
26-Week Price Return7.51%9.79%
52-Week Price Return11.68%16.82%
Month-to-Date Return-0.46%0.55%
Year-to-Date Return10.22%10.53%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.56M1.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.58M2.04M
3-Month Volatility17.48%17.51%
Beta0.410.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMS

12.37%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
19.69%
Q3
12.97%
Median
9.30%
Q1
7.88%
Min
4.34%

CMS’s Return on Equity of 12.37% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LNT

11.80%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.82%
Q3
14.31%
Median
10.58%
Q1
7.57%
Min
1.03%

LNT’s Return on Equity of 11.80% is on par with the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

13.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
25.37%
Q3
15.24%
Median
8.50%
Q1
4.09%
Min
-1.05%

CMS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LNT

20.78%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
17.23%
Median
11.43%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-2.53%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.78% places LNT in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

22.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
43.73%
Q3
25.91%
Median
19.49%
Q1
8.11%
Min
-0.18%

CMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.35% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LNT

25.32%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
46.44%
Q3
26.51%
Median
19.26%
Q1
11.77%
Min
2.81%

LNT’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.32% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMSLNT
Return on Equity (TTM)12.37%11.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.83%3.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.35%20.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.35%25.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.86%39.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

1.00

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.22
Median
0.94
Q1
0.86
Min
0.50

CMS’s Current Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LNT

0.57

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.22
Median
0.99
Q1
0.78
Min
0.34

LNT’s Current Ratio of 0.57 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.15

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.58
Q3
1.96
Median
1.56
Q1
1.20
Min
0.53

CMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Multi-Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.15. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

LNT

1.58

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

LNT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.58 is typical for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.73

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
12.21
Q3
7.03
Median
3.61
Q1
2.92
Min
1.62

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.73 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LNT

2.84

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
10.64
Median
3.32
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

LNT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.84 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMSLNT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.000.57
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.730.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.151.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.732.84

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMS vs. LNT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMS vs. LNT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMS

3.32%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
8.75%
Q3
5.46%
Median
4.09%
Q1
2.93%
Min
0.00%

CMS’s Dividend Yield of 3.32% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LNT

2.98%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
4.67%
Median
3.84%
Q1
2.48%
Min
0.00%

LNT’s Dividend Yield of 2.98% is consistent with its peers in the Electric Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMS

71.26%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
128.77%
Q3
97.17%
Median
66.46%
Q1
52.95%
Min
24.73%

CMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.26% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LNT

66.98%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
150.16%
Q3
88.91%
Median
65.69%
Q1
34.65%
Min
0.00%

LNT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.98% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMSLNT
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.32%2.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.26%66.98%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMS

21.44

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
28.21
Q3
21.40
Median
16.89
Q1
11.54
Min
5.08

A P/E Ratio of 21.44 places CMS in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LNT

20.15

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
39.85
Q3
21.79
Median
15.62
Q1
8.97
Min
3.03

LNT’s P/E Ratio of 20.15 is within the middle range for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.86

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.52
Median
1.87
Q1
0.50
Min
0.27

CMS’s P/S Ratio of 2.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LNT

4.19

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
5.96
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
1.14
Min
0.15

LNT’s P/S Ratio of 4.19 is in the upper echelon for the Electric Utilities industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.47

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.97
Median
1.46
Q1
1.21
Min
0.86

CMS’s P/B Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LNT

2.17

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
1.11
Min
0.18

LNT’s P/B Ratio of 2.17 is in the upper tier for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CMS vs. LNT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMSLNT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.4420.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.864.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.472.17
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)158.92117.41