CMI vs. WTS: Cummins vs. Watts Water Stock Comparison
How do Cummins (CMI) and Watts Water (WTS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cummins (CMI) and Watts Water (WTS) both belong to the Machinery industry, though CMI is classified under Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment while WTS falls under Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components.
| Profile Item | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cummins Inc. | Watts Water Technologies, Inc. Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 61.69 billion USD | 11.55 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | August 21, 1986 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -0.52% | 33.85% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 31.79% | 25.59% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.12% | 12.56% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.83% | 27.38% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 1.11 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.12% | -44.08% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.14M | 225.08K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.13 | 1.08 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.18 | 1.78 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 25.05% and Watts Water (WTS) at 20.91% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
25.05%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CMI
- 25.05%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
20.91%
- Max
- 40.55%
- WTS
- 20.91%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Watts Water (WTS) at 16.00% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cummins (CMI) at 9.26%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
9.26%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- CMI
- 9.26%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
16.00%
- Max
- 27.47%
- WTS
- 16.00%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Watts Water (WTS) at 20.85% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cummins (CMI) at 13.95%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
13.95%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- CMI
- 13.95%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
20.85%
- Max
- 36.60%
- WTS
- 20.85%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.05% | 20.91% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.60% | 12.05% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.26% | 16.00% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.95% | 20.85% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.32% | 49.09% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Watts Water (WTS) at 8.27% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -1.27% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Watts Water (WTS) at 17.03% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -27.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.27% | 8.27% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.25% | 7.20% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -27.74% | 17.03% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.68% | 10.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 1.74 and Watts Water (WTS) at 2.80 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.74
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- CMI
- 1.74
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
2.80
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- WTS
- 2.80
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Watts Water (WTS) at 0.08 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cummins (CMI) at 0.52 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CMI
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
0.08
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- WTS
- 0.08
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.74 | 2.80 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | -0.40 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 1.83% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Watts Water (WTS) at 0.66% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CMI the richer one.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CMI
- 1.83%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
0.66%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- WTS
- 0.66%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Watts Water (WTS) at 17.24% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Cummins (CMI) at 34.21% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
34.21%
- Max
- 67.39%
- CMI
- 34.21%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
17.24%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- WTS
- 17.24%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.83% | 0.66% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 34.21% | 17.24% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 18.78 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Watts Water (WTS) at 25.95 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for CMI, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
18.78
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- CMI
- 18.78
- Min
- 3.03
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
25.95
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- WTS
- 25.95
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 1.72 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Watts Water (WTS) at 4.14 sits in the pricier quartile — WTS costs more per dollar of sales.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.72
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- CMI
- 1.72
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
4.14
- Max
- 7.54
- WTS
- 4.14
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cummins (CMI) at 4.63 and Watts Water (WTS) at 4.98 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
4.63
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- CMI
- 4.63
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
WTS
Capital Goods industry group
4.98
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- WTS
- 4.98
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CMI | WTS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 18.78 | 25.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.72 | 4.14 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.63 | 4.98 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.06% | 2.21% |