CMI vs. HUBB: Cummins vs. Hubbell Stock Comparison
How do Cummins (CMI) and Hubbell (HUBB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cummins (CMI) and Hubbell (HUBB) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CMI is classified in Machinery while HUBB is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cummins Inc. | Hubbell Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 61.69 billion USD | 22.69 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | June 5, 1972 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -0.52% | -2.60% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 31.79% | 17.51% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.12% | 18.15% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.83% | 32.90% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 0.82 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.12% | -32.65% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.14M | 557.78K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.13 | -0.21 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.18 | -0.28 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 25.05% and Hubbell (HUBB) at 23.43% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
25.05%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CMI
- 25.05%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
23.43%
- Max
- 40.55%
- HUBB
- 23.43%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Hubbell (HUBB) at 13.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cummins (CMI) at 9.26%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
9.26%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- CMI
- 9.26%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
13.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- HUBB
- 13.78%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Hubbell (HUBB) at 20.52% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cummins (CMI) at 13.95%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
13.95%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- CMI
- 13.95%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
20.52%
- Max
- 36.60%
- HUBB
- 20.52%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.05% | 23.43% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.60% | 8.53% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.26% | 13.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.95% | 20.52% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.32% | 35.02% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Hubbell (HUBB) at 3.84% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -1.27% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Hubbell (HUBB) at 15.10% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -27.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.27% | 3.84% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.25% | 5.71% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -27.74% | 15.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.68% | 20.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 1.74 and Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.53 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.74
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- CMI
- 1.74
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.53
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- HUBB
- 1.53
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Cummins (CMI) at 0.52 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.29 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CMI
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.29
- Max
- 2.33
- HUBB
- 1.29
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.74 | 1.53 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 1.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | 3.09 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 1.83% and Hubbell (HUBB) at 1.36% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CMI
- 1.83%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
1.36%
- Max
- 2.66%
- HUBB
- 1.36%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 34.21% and Hubbell (HUBB) at 33.31% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
34.21%
- Max
- 67.39%
- CMI
- 34.21%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
33.31%
- Max
- 67.39%
- HUBB
- 33.31%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.83% | 1.36% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 34.21% | 33.31% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 18.78 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 25.19 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for CMI, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
18.78
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- CMI
- 18.78
- Min
- 3.03
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
25.19
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- HUBB
- 25.19
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Cummins (CMI) at 1.72 and Hubbell (HUBB) at 3.44 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.72
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- CMI
- 1.72
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
3.44
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- HUBB
- 3.44
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cummins (CMI) at 4.63 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Hubbell (HUBB) at 5.53 carries an above-peer premium to book — HUBB is pricier on assets.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
4.63
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- CMI
- 4.63
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
HUBB
Capital Goods industry group
5.53
- Max
- 9.66
- HUBB
- 5.53
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CMI | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 18.78 | 25.19 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.72 | 3.44 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.63 | 5.53 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.06% | 2.44% |