CMI vs. GWW: Cummins vs. W.W. Grainger Stock Comparison
How do Cummins (CMI) and W.W. Grainger (GWW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cummins (CMI) and W.W. Grainger (GWW) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CMI is classified in Machinery while GWW is classified in Trading Companies & Distributors.
| Profile Item | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cummins Inc. | W.W. Grainger Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment | Trading Companies & Distributors |
| Market Capitalization | 61.69 billion USD | 67.45 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | February 21, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -0.52% | 54.07% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 31.79% | 24.16% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.12% | 25.95% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.83% | 24.49% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 0.93 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.12% | -24.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.14M | 250.35K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.13 | 2.03 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.18 | 3.31 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 52.33% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Cummins (CMI) at 25.05% also sits in the top quartile.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
25.05%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CMI
- 25.05%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
52.33%
- GWW
- 52.33%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 9.26% and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 11.17% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
9.26%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- CMI
- 9.26%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
11.17%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- GWW
- 11.17%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 13.95% and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 16.14% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
13.95%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- CMI
- 13.95%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
16.14%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- GWW
- 16.14%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.05% | 52.33% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.60% | 20.34% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.26% | 11.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.95% | 16.14% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.32% | 39.43% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 4.51% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -1.27% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at -8.55% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -27.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.27% | 4.51% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.25% | 5.62% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -27.74% | -8.55% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.68% | 5.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 1.74 and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 2.61 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.74
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- CMI
- 1.74
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
2.61
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- GWW
- 2.61
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 0.52 and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CMI
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- GWW
- 0.65
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.74 | 2.61 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.65 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | 0.69 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 1.83% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 0.65% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CMI the richer one.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CMI
- 1.83%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
0.65%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- GWW
- 0.65%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 20.87% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Cummins (CMI) at 34.21% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
34.21%
- Max
- 67.39%
- CMI
- 34.21%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
20.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- GWW
- 20.87%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.83% | 0.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 34.21% | 20.87% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 18.78 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 31.66 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for CMI, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
18.78
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- CMI
- 18.78
- Min
- 3.03
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
31.66
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- GWW
- 31.66
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Cummins (CMI) at 1.72 and W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 3.48 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.72
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- CMI
- 1.72
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
3.48
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- GWW
- 3.48
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cummins (CMI) at 4.63 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while W.W. Grainger (GWW) at 15.56 prices above its benchmark range — GWW looks rich relative to book.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
4.63
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- CMI
- 4.63
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
GWW
Capital Goods industry group
15.56
- GWW
- 15.56
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CMI | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 18.78 | 31.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.72 | 3.48 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.63 | 15.56 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.06% | 1.97% |