CMI vs. ESLT: Cummins vs. Elbit Systems Stock Comparison
How do Cummins (CMI) and Elbit Systems (ESLT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cummins (CMI) and Elbit Systems (ESLT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CMI is classified in Machinery while ESLT is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cummins Inc. | Elbit Systems Ltd. |
| Country/Region | United States | Israel |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 61.69 billion USD | 32.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | November 27, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -0.52% | 55.34% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 31.79% | 57.29% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.12% | 37.24% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Cummins (CMI) trades around 1.14M shares per day on average, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) sees only 88.09K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.
| Metric | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.83% | 47.34% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 0.10 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.12% | -35.54% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.14M | 88.09K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.13 | 1.08 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.18 | 1.76 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 25.05% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 15.24% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CMI.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
25.05%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CMI
- 25.05%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
15.24%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- ESLT
- 15.24%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 9.26% and Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 7.44% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
9.26%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- CMI
- 9.26%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
7.44%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- ESLT
- 7.44%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 13.95% and Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 9.57% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
13.95%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- CMI
- 13.95%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
9.57%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- ESLT
- 9.57%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.05% | 15.24% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.60% | 3.87% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.26% | 7.44% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.95% | 9.57% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.32% | 25.03% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 16.27% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -1.27% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 58.64% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Cummins (CMI) at -27.74% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.27% | 16.27% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.25% | 12.93% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -27.74% | 58.64% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.68% | 22.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cummins (CMI) at 1.74 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 1.40 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ESLT.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.74
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- CMI
- 1.74
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
1.40
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- ESLT
- 1.40
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 0.19 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cummins (CMI) at 0.52 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CMI
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
0.19
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- ESLT
- 0.19
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.74 | 1.40 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.19 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | -0.11 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 1.83% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 0.58% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CMI the richer one.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CMI
- 1.83%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
0.58%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- ESLT
- 0.58%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 23.33% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Cummins (CMI) at 34.21% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
34.21%
- Max
- 67.39%
- CMI
- 34.21%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
23.33%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- ESLT
- 23.33%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.83% | 0.58% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 34.21% | 23.33% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cummins (CMI) at 18.78 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 51.36 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
18.78
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- CMI
- 18.78
- Min
- 3.03
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
51.36
- Max
- 59.38
- ESLT
- 51.36
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Cummins (CMI) at 1.72 and Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 3.74 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.72
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- CMI
- 1.72
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- ESLT
- 3.74
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cummins (CMI) at 4.63 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 7.24 carries an above-peer premium to book — ESLT is pricier on assets.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
4.63
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- CMI
- 4.63
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
7.24
- Max
- 9.66
- ESLT
- 7.24
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CMI | ESLT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 18.78 | 51.36 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.72 | 3.74 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.63 | 7.24 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.06% | -0.12% |