CME vs. SCHW: CME vs. Charles Schwab Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CME is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while SCHW falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Company profile comparison for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Profile Item	CME	SCHW
Name	CME Group Inc. Class A Common Stock	The Charles Schwab Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry Group	Financial Services	Financial Services
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Capital Markets
GICS Sub-Industry	Financial Exchanges & Data	Investment Banking & Brokerage
Market Capitalization	109.49 billion USD	158.22 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	December 6, 2002	September 22, 1987
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CME

SCHW

GSPC

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Metric	CME	SCHW
Total Return (1Y)	14.24%	-0.80%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	16.88%	21.35%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	11.09%	4.31%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CME

SCHW

GSPC

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Metric	CME	SCHW
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	24.87%	26.01%
Beta (5Y)	0.16	0.74
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-31.74%	-49.70%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.91M	8.22M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CME and SCHW are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Metric	CME	SCHW
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.40	-0.20
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.56	-0.26

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both CME (CME) at 16.13% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 21.12% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CME

Financial Services industry group

16.13%

Max: 44.78%
Q3: 21.85%
CME: 16.13%
Median: 12.91%
Q1: 4.48%
Min: -18.71%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

21.12%

Max: 44.78%
Q3: 21.85%
SCHW: 21.12%
Median: 12.91%
Q1: 4.48%
Min: -18.71%

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

CME (CME) at 63.48% keeps the most of each sales dollar — above its industry’s net margin range — and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 39.33% also retains a top-quartile share.

CME

Financial Services industry group

63.48%

CME: 63.48%
Max: 62.84%
Q3: 28.05%
Median: 15.36%
Q1: 4.82%
Min: -28.52%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

39.33%

Max: 62.84%
SCHW: 39.33%
Q3: 28.05%
Median: 15.36%
Q1: 4.82%
Min: -28.52%

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

CME (CME) at 65.85% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 52.67%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CME

Financial Services industry group

65.85%

Max: 107.33%
CME: 65.85%
Q3: 55.90%
Median: 30.09%
Q1: 14.60%
Min: -44.34%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

52.67%

Max: 107.33%
Q3: 55.90%
SCHW: 52.67%
Median: 30.09%
Q1: 14.60%
Min: -44.34%

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Metric	CME	SCHW
ROE (TTM)	16.13%	21.12%
ROA (TTM)	1.52%	2.16%
Net Margin (TTM)	63.48%	39.33%
Operating Margin (TTM)	65.85%	52.67%
Gross Margin (TTM)	--	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both CME (CME) at 6.37% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 22.01% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 55.52% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while CME (CME) at 15.41% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SCHW.

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Metric	CME	SCHW
Revenue Growth (YoY)	6.37%	22.01%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	9.11%	4.83%
EPS Growth (YoY)	15.41%	55.52%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	14.68%	9.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: CME (CME) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: CME (CME) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Metric	CME	SCHW
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	--
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	--	--
Net Debt / EBITDA	--	--

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both CME (CME) at 1.68% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 1.33% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CME

Financial Services industry group

1.68%

Max: 9.77%
Q3: 3.92%
CME: 1.68%
Median: 1.09%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

1.33%

Max: 9.77%
Q3: 3.92%
SCHW: 1.33%
Median: 1.09%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both CME (CME) at 92.62% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 21.03% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CME

Financial Services industry group

92.62%

Max: 241.07%
Q3: 97.36%
CME: 92.62%
Median: 25.77%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

21.03%

Max: 241.07%
Q3: 97.36%
Median: 25.77%
SCHW: 21.03%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Metric	CME	SCHW
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.68%	1.33%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	92.62%	21.03%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 15.64 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CME (CME) at 25.07 sits in the richer quartile — CME needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CME

Financial Services industry group

25.07

Max: 45.85
CME: 25.07
Q3: 24.64
Median: 15.37
Q1: 9.68
Min: 0.16

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

15.64

Max: 45.85
Q3: 24.64
SCHW: 15.64
Median: 15.37
Q1: 9.68
Min: 0.16

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on sales: Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 5.85 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and CME (CME) at 15.74 prices even higher, above its industry range.

CME

Financial Services industry group

15.74

CME: 15.74
Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.57
Median: 2.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: -0.55

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

5.85

Max: 9.23
SCHW: 5.85
Q3: 4.57
Median: 2.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: -0.55

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 3.08 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while CME (CME) at 4.12 carries an above-peer premium to book — CME is pricier on assets.

CME

Financial Services industry group

4.12

Max: 7.79
CME: 4.12
Q3: 3.63
Median: 1.57
Q1: 0.81
Min: -0.39

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

3.08

Max: 7.79
Q3: 3.63
SCHW: 3.08
Median: 1.57
Q1: 0.81
Min: -0.39

CME (CME) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for CME (CME) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Metric	CME	SCHW
P/E Ratio (TTM)	25.07	15.64
P/S Ratio (TTM)	15.74	5.85
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	4.12	3.08
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	--	--