CM vs. USB: Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce vs. U.S. Bancorp Stock Comparison
How do Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | U.S. Bancorp |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Banks | Banks |
| GICS Industry | Banks | Banks |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Banks | Diversified Banks |
| Market Capitalization | 104.58 billion USD | 92.64 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 13, 1997 | May 3, 1973 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 41.10% | 34.87% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 51.34% | 27.22% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 19.22% | 4.97% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 22.16% | 22.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -41.86% | -52.13% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.09M | 7.25M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.66 | 1.35 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.44 | 1.98 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.58% sits in the top ROE quartile, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 12.84% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CM.
CM
Banks industry group
15.58%
- Max
- 19.84%
- CM
- 15.58%
- Q3
- 13.67%
- Median
- 11.49%
- Q1
- 9.50%
- Min
- 3.64%
USB
Banks industry group
12.84%
- Max
- 19.84%
- Q3
- 13.67%
- USB
- 12.84%
- Median
- 11.49%
- Q1
- 9.50%
- Min
- 3.64%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 33.74% and U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 30.01% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CM
Banks industry group
33.74%
- Max
- 47.19%
- Q3
- 35.25%
- CM
- 33.74%
- Median
- 31.21%
- Q1
- 27.11%
- Min
- 14.93%
USB
Banks industry group
30.01%
- Max
- 47.19%
- Q3
- 35.25%
- Median
- 31.21%
- USB
- 30.01%
- Q1
- 27.11%
- Min
- 14.93%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.58% | 12.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.89% | 1.20% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 33.74% | 30.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 13.66% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 4.41% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 17.72% and U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 21.90% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 13.66% | 4.41% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.06% | 5.68% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 17.72% | 21.90% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.66% | 7.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 3.62% and U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 3.51% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
CM
Banks industry group
3.62%
- Max
- 5.79%
- CM
- 3.62%
- Q3
- 3.18%
- Median
- 2.39%
- Q1
- 1.20%
- Min
- 0.00%
USB
Banks industry group
3.51%
- Max
- 5.79%
- USB
- 3.51%
- Q3
- 3.18%
- Median
- 2.39%
- Q1
- 1.20%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 40.12% and U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 40.86% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CM
Banks industry group
40.12%
- Max
- 70.75%
- Q3
- 41.28%
- CM
- 40.12%
- Median
- 29.26%
- Q1
- 18.98%
- Min
- 0.00%
USB
Banks industry group
40.86%
- Max
- 70.75%
- Q3
- 41.28%
- USB
- 40.86%
- Median
- 29.26%
- Q1
- 18.98%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.62% | 3.51% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 40.12% | 40.86% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 11.57 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.32 sits in the richer quartile — CM needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CM
Banks industry group
15.32
- Max
- 18.16
- CM
- 15.32
- Q3
- 13.75
- Median
- 11.81
- Q1
- 10.64
- Min
- 6.49
USB
Banks industry group
11.57
- Max
- 18.16
- Q3
- 13.75
- Median
- 11.81
- USB
- 11.57
- Q1
- 10.64
- Min
- 6.49
P/S Ratio (TTM)
P/S ratio is set aside for both Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks and U.S. Bancorp (USB) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 1.55 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 2.24 carries an above-peer premium to book — CM is pricier on assets.
CM
Banks industry group
2.24
- Max
- 2.28
- CM
- 2.24
- Q3
- 1.58
- Median
- 1.32
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.59
USB
Banks industry group
1.55
- Max
- 2.28
- Q3
- 1.58
- USB
- 1.55
- Median
- 1.32
- Q1
- 1.10
- Min
- 0.59
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CM | USB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 15.32 | 11.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.24 | 1.55 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |