CM vs. SHG: Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce vs. Shinhan Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and Shinhan Financial (SHG) are both classified in the Diversified Banks sub-industry within the broader Banks industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) trades as ordinary local shares, while Shinhan Financial (SHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.58% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Shinhan Financial (SHG) at 8.94% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 33.74% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Shinhan Financial (SHG) at 26.15% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks and Shinhan Financial (SHG) in Banks, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 13.66% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Shinhan Financial (SHG) at 4.66% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Both Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 17.72% and Shinhan Financial (SHG) at 16.24% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks and Shinhan Financial (SHG) in Banks both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks and Shinhan Financial (SHG) in Banks run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 3.62% earns its spot in the top quartile of its industry’s yields; Shinhan Financial (SHG) at 4,638.28% is past the top of its own peer range — territory where a dividend-safety check matters more than the headline number.

Both Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 40.12% and Shinhan Financial (SHG) at 25.22% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Shinhan Financial (SHG) at 7.98 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 15.32 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

P/S ratio is set aside for both Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) in Banks and Shinhan Financial (SHG) in Banks: without a conventional revenue line, pricing per dollar of sales isn’t meaningful, and book- or earnings-based multiples make the better comparison.

Shinhan Financial (SHG) at 0.66 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Cdn Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 2.24 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics