Seek Returns logo

CLX vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLX and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CLX is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCLXUL
Company NameThe Clorox CompanyUnilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization15.21 billion USD146.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLX and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLX vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLXUL
5-Day Price Return-0.02%-1.73%
13-Week Price Return-0.70%-2.54%
26-Week Price Return-15.76%-3.23%
52-Week Price Return-24.69%-8.94%
Month-to-Date Return-0.50%-0.64%
Year-to-Date Return-24.46%-3.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.16M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.87M2.11M
3-Month Volatility20.99%15.26%
Beta0.580.18

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLX

453.68%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CLX’s Return on Equity of 453.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLX

11.40%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

CLX’s Net Profit Margin of 11.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLX

15.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

CLX’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.17% is around the midpoint for the Household Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLXUL
Return on Equity (TTM)453.68%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.63%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.40%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.17%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)45.16%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLX

0.84

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CLX’s Current Ratio of 0.84 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLX

7.75

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 7.75, CLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

UL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Personal Care Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLX

8.17

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

In the lower quartile for the Household Products industry, CLX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLXUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.840.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)7.751.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.1722.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLX vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLX vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLX

4.03%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.03%, CLX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Household Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UL

3.56%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.56%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLX

74.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CLX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 74.32% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLXUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.03%3.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)74.32%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLX

18.42

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

CLX’s P/E Ratio of 18.42 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UL

22.31

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

UL’s P/E Ratio of 22.31 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLX

2.10

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CLX’s P/S Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UL

2.07

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLX

46.10

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

CLX’s P/B Ratio of 46.10 is in the upper tier for the Household Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UL

7.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.00 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CLX vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLXUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.4222.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.102.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)46.107.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.6119.25