Seek Returns logo

CLVT vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLVT and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CLVT is a standard domestic listing, while GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCLVTGDS
Company NameClarivate PlcGDS Holdings Limited
CountryUnited KingdomChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesIT Services
Market Capitalization2.86 billion USD6.88 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateOctober 29, 2018November 2, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLVT and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLVT vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLVTGDS
5-Day Price Return11.81%-1.84%
13-Week Price Return-2.07%29.01%
26-Week Price Return-14.97%42.30%
52-Week Price Return-22.69%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return10.65%-0.79%
Year-to-Date Return-16.14%54.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.10M6.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.67M8.73M
3-Month Volatility41.44%60.94%
Beta1.451.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLVT

-8.38%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

CLVT has a negative Return on Equity of -8.38%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLVT

-17.33%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

CLVT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -17.33%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLVT

-2.18%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

CLVT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.18%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLVTGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)-8.38%19.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)-3.73%5.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-17.33%41.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-2.18%21.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)66.07%21.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLVT

0.91

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

CLVT’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLVT

0.90

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

CLVT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.90 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLVT

-0.96

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

CLVT has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.96. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLVTGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.911.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.851.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.901.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.960.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLVT vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLVT vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLVT

0.00%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

CLVT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLVT

14.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

CLVT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.95% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLVTGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.95%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLVT

--

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

P/E Ratio data for CLVT is currently unavailable.

GDS

11.54

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 11.54 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLVT

1.14

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

CLVT’s P/S Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS

4.82

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.82 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLVT

0.59

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

CLVT’s P/B Ratio of 0.59 is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GDS

1.40

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CLVT vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLVTGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--11.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.144.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.591.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.64--