Seek Returns logo

CLS vs. LRCX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at CLS and LRCX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

LRCX’s market capitalization of 115.17 billion USD is significantly greater than CLS’s 15.49 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.64 for CLS and 1.66 for LRCX, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolCLSLRCX
Company NameCelestica Inc.Lam Research Corporation
CountryCAUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSemiconductors
CEOMr. Robert Andrew MionisMr. Timothy M. Archer
Price134.74 USD90.038 USD
Market Cap15.49 billion USD115.17 billion USD
Beta1.641.66
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateJune 30, 1998May 4, 1984
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLS and LRCX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Profitability

Return on Equity

CLS

23.32%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
10.85%
Median
4.18%
Q1
-28.42%
Min
-80.25%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 23.32% is in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signaling a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LRCX

52.74%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
13.07%
Median
3.57%
Q1
-15.35%
Min
-57.53%

LRCX’s Return on Equity of 52.74% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signaling a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

CLS

16.79%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.09%
Q3
7.64%
Median
3.93%
Q1
-15.38%
Min
-43.63%

CLS’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.79% is in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

LRCX

30.37%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.26%
Q3
9.13%
Median
2.19%
Q1
-12.00%
Min
-33.58%

LRCX’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.37% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

CLS

4.09%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
42.40%
Q3
8.67%
Median
2.09%
Q1
-30.99%
Min
-80.83%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 4.09% is within the central 50% of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its ability to convert sales into profit is typical for the sector.

LRCX

27.19%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
76.59%
Q3
18.08%
Median
2.74%
Q1
-31.69%
Min
-86.90%

LRCX’s Net Profit Margin of 27.19% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

CLS

6.01%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
51.32%
Q3
12.50%
Median
5.48%
Q1
-27.94%
Min
-86.75%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.01% hovers around the midpoint for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is characteristic of the sector.

LRCX

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
61.81%
Q3
19.54%
Median
3.04%
Q1
-23.21%
Min
-81.19%

LRCX’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.91% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSLRCX
Return on Equity (TTM)23.32%52.74%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.07%23.33%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)16.79%30.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.09%27.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.01%30.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)10.59%48.08%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

CLS

1.43

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.71
Q3
3.50
Median
2.47
Q1
1.67
Min
0.51

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.43 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LRCX

2.45

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.43
Q3
5.27
Median
3.11
Q1
2.23
Min
0.05

LRCX’s Current Ratio of 2.45 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

CLS

0.60

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.70
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LRCX

0.47

Semiconductors Industry

Max
1.08
Q3
0.48
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

LRCX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

CLS

12.39

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
19.79
Q3
11.91
Median
4.87
Q1
1.73
Min
-13.16

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.39 is in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments out of operating profits.

LRCX

29.12

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
23.04
Median
2.34
Q1
-13.81
Min
-39.42

LRCX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.12 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments out of operating profits.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSLRCX
Current Ratio (TTM)1.432.45
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.851.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.600.47
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.22
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.88-0.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.3929.12

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for CLS and LRCX. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth (YoY)

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

EPS Growth (YoY)

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year EPS (Earnings Per Share) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth (YoY)

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

CLS

0.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
0.96%
Q3
0.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting all earnings back into the business, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LRCX

1.02%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
1.68%
Q3
0.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LRCX’s Dividend Yield of 1.02% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, offering a more attractive income stream than most of its peers and signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

CLS

0.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
13.83%
Q3
8.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This strategy is common for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LRCX

23.95%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
43.75%
Q3
19.56%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LRCX’s payout ratio of 23.95% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns, but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is being retained for reinvestment compared to its peers.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSLRCX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.02%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%23.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

CLS

37.86

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
95.07
Q3
57.90
Median
37.14
Q1
24.86
Min
11.53

CLS’s P/E Ratio of 37.86 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LRCX

24.81

Semiconductors Industry

Max
61.62
Q3
37.34
Median
25.54
Q1
16.45
Min
0.78

LRCX’s P/E Ratio of 24.81 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

CLS

1.84

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.10
Median
1.89
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is not a primary valuation metric for companies in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

LRCX

2.07

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.19
Median
1.01
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is not a primary valuation metric for companies in the Semiconductors industry.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

CLS

1.54

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
9.15
Q3
5.41
Median
2.41
Q1
1.47
Min
0.02

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LRCX

6.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
20.55
Q3
10.00
Median
4.00
Q1
1.80
Min
0.18

LRCX’s P/S Ratio of 6.72 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

CLS

10.03

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.21
Q3
4.70
Median
3.06
Q1
2.08
Min
0.01

At 10.03, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market‘s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential, rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LRCX

12.15

Semiconductors Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
5.97
Median
2.72
Q1
1.39
Min
0.05

LRCX’s P/B Ratio of 12.15 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a high price relative to the company‘s net assets, which hinges on its ability to generate superior profits to justify the high valuation.

CLS vs. LRCX: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Hardware, Equipment & Parts and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSLRCX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)37.8624.81
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.842.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.546.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)10.0312.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)43.9428.14
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.2619.60
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.606.66