Seek Returns logo

CLS vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLS and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSJBL
Company NameCelestica Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization28.95 billion USD23.16 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 1998May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLS and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLS vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSJBL
5-Day Price Return2.47%2.21%
13-Week Price Return63.84%-0.60%
26-Week Price Return173.32%54.12%
52-Week Price Return395.33%79.29%
Month-to-Date Return28.03%-1.07%
Year-to-Date Return158.16%49.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.10M2.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.87M1.53M
3-Month Volatility59.01%33.42%
Beta2.721.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLS

30.66%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 30.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

5.09%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 5.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

7.01%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.01% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)30.66%45.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.98%3.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.09%2.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.01%3.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)11.36%8.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

1.44

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

0.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLS

36.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.72 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

JBL

4.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.441.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.860.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.501.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.724.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLS vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLS vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLS

52.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

A P/E Ratio of 52.50 places CLS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

JBL

35.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 35.24 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLS

2.67

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.78

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.78 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

9.99

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 9.99, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CLS vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)52.5035.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.670.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.9914.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)73.2119.76