Seek Returns

CLS vs. IONQ: Celestica vs. IonQ Stock Comparison

How do Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but CLS is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components while IONQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

Celestica (CLS) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 30, 1998, whereas IonQ (IONQ) listed on January 4, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Company profile comparison for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
Profile ItemCLSIONQ
NameCelestica Inc.IonQ, Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupTechnology Hardware & EquipmentTechnology Hardware & Equipment
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
GICS Sub-IndustryElectronic Manufacturing ServicesTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization26.06 billion USD15.16 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 1998January 4, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CLS
IONQ
GSPC
Loading price history…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
MetricCLSIONQ
Total Return (1Y)-30.98%-40.10%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)108.72%46.76%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)80.82%9.52%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CLS
IONQ
GSPC
Loading price history…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
MetricCLSIONQ
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)80.89%94.72%
Beta (5Y)2.163.33
Max Drawdown (5Y)-56.47%-90.00%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.61M22.02M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CLS and IONQ are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
MetricCLSIONQ
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.44-0.47
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.59-0.74

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Celestica (CLS) at 30.23% sits in the top ROE quartile, while IonQ (IONQ) at 6.90% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CLS.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

30.23%

Max
42.47%
CLS
30.23%
Q3
19.13%
Median
11.00%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-20.62%

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

6.90%

Max
42.47%
Q3
19.13%
Median
11.00%
IONQ
6.90%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-20.62%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their ROE against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

IonQ (IONQ) at 67.09% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Celestica (CLS) at 6.83% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

6.83%

Max
27.60%
Q3
11.66%
CLS
6.83%
Median
4.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-11.02%

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

67.09%

IONQ
67.09%
Max
27.60%
Q3
11.66%
Median
4.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-11.02%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their net margin against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

IonQ (IONQ) reports a negative operating margin of -249.14%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Celestica (CLS) reports 7.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

7.91%

Max
36.27%
Q3
18.36%
Median
8.84%
CLS
7.91%
Q1
1.46%
Min
-21.39%

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

-249.14%

Max
36.27%
Q3
18.36%
Median
8.84%
Q1
1.46%
Min
-21.39%
IONQ
-249.14%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their operating margin against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
MetricCLSIONQ
ROE (TTM)30.23%6.90%
ROA (TTM)8.72%-12.60%
Net Margin (TTM)6.83%67.09%
Operating Margin (TTM)7.91%-249.14%
Gross Margin (TTM)11.46%24.67%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but IonQ (IONQ) at 201.85% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Celestica (CLS) at 28.46% also sits in the top quartile.

Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Celestica (CLS) reports EPS growth of 98.34%, ranked against its industry; IonQ (IONQ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
MetricCLSIONQ
Revenue Growth (YoY)28.46%201.85%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)19.56%126.89%
EPS Growth (YoY)98.34%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)82.39%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while IonQ (IONQ) at 4.24 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.61

Max
5.34
Q3
3.02
Median
1.95
CLS
1.61
Q1
1.32
Min
0.17

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

4.24

Max
5.34
IONQ
4.24
Q3
3.02
Median
1.95
Q1
1.32
Min
0.17
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their current ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

IonQ (IONQ) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Celestica (CLS) at 0.17 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.17

Max
1.76
Q3
0.78
Median
0.24
CLS
0.17
Q1
0.04
Min
0.01

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.01

Max
1.76
Q3
0.78
Median
0.24
Q1
0.04
IONQ
0.01
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
MetricCLSIONQ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.614.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.170.01
Net Debt / EBITDA-1.72--

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Neither Celestica (CLS) nor IonQ (IONQ) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max
0.73%
Q3
0.31%
CLS
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max
0.73%
Q3
0.31%
IONQ
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Neither Celestica (CLS) nor IonQ (IONQ) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max
32.27%
Q3
14.48%
CLS
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max
32.27%
Q3
14.48%
IONQ
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
MetricCLSIONQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

IonQ (IONQ) at 18.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Celestica (CLS) at 19.50 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for IONQ, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

19.50

Max
69.48
Q3
41.02
Median
26.39
CLS
19.50
Q1
19.36
Min
6.07

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

18.86

Max
69.48
Q3
41.02
Median
26.39
Q1
19.36
IONQ
18.86
Min
6.07
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while IonQ (IONQ) at 39.84 clears its benchmark range — IONQ looks notably rich on sales.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.43

Max
11.30
Q3
5.82
Median
2.56
CLS
1.43
Q1
1.05
Min
0.00

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

39.84

IONQ
39.84
Max
11.30
Q3
5.82
Median
2.56
Q1
1.05
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 4.19 and IonQ (IONQ) at 2.67 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

4.19

Max
10.75
Q3
5.52
CLS
4.19
Median
3.17
Q1
1.79
Min
0.33

IONQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

2.67

Max
10.75
Q3
5.52
Median
3.17
IONQ
2.67
Q1
1.79
Min
0.33
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. IonQ (IONQ): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Celestica (CLS) and IonQ (IONQ)
MetricCLSIONQ
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.5018.86
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.4339.84
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.192.67
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.08%-2.81%