Seek Returns logo

CLS vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLS and ERIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CLS is a standard domestic listing, while ERIC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCLSERIC
Company NameCelestica Inc.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
CountryCanadaSweden
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization23.49 billion USD25.46 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 30, 1998August 24, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLS and ERIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLS vs. ERIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
5-Day Price Return7.73%2.37%
13-Week Price Return126.89%-8.82%
26-Week Price Return43.11%-11.85%
52-Week Price Return335.42%4.50%
Month-to-Date Return6.23%2.83%
Year-to-Date Return121.82%-18.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.06M4.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.87M6.66M
3-Month Volatility54.67%27.46%
Beta2.980.80

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLS

30.66%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 30.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ERIC

19.57%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

ERIC’s Return on Equity of 19.57% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

5.09%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 5.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ERIC

7.04%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

7.01%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.01% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ERIC

10.60%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

ERIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.60% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
Return on Equity (TTM)30.66%19.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.98%6.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.09%7.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.01%10.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)11.36%47.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

1.44

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ERIC

1.09

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

0.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ERIC

0.50

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLS

36.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ERIC

3.82

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.441.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.860.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.500.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.723.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLS vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLS vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ERIC

3.79%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.79%, ERIC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ERIC

70.91%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.91% is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%70.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLS

45.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 45.70 places CLS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ERIC

14.23

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/E Ratio of 14.23 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLS

2.32

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ERIC

1.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

10.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 10.12, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ERIC

3.15

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 3.15 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)45.7014.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.321.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.123.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)63.726.35