Seek Returns logo

CLS vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLS and ERIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CLS is a standard domestic listing, while ERIC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCLSERIC
Company NameCelestica Inc.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
CountryCanadaSweden
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization39.64 billion USD32.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 30, 1998August 24, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLS and ERIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLS vs. ERIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
5-Day Price Return-6.48%-5.09%
13-Week Price Return63.35%27.23%
26-Week Price Return254.03%14.65%
52-Week Price Return281.71%3.88%
Month-to-Date Return-6.48%-3.42%
Year-to-Date Return240.42%2.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.78M7.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.89M6.51M
3-Month Volatility59.18%40.10%
Beta2.580.73

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLS

39.60%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 39.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ERIC

26.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s Return on Equity of 26.66% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

6.35%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ERIC

10.26%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 10.26% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

8.23%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.23% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ERIC

14.74%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.74% places ERIC in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
Return on Equity (TTM)39.60%26.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.62%8.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.35%10.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.23%14.74%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.04%47.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

1.47

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ERIC

1.17

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.17 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

0.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ERIC

0.43

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLS

36.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.72 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ERIC

3.82

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.471.17
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.880.94
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.723.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLS vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLS vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ERIC

3.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Yield of 3.00% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ERIC

45.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.50% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%45.50%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLS

51.71

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

A P/E Ratio of 51.71 places CLS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ERIC

12.60

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/E Ratio of 12.60 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLS

3.29

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 3.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ERIC

1.29

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

13.85

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 13.85, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ERIC

2.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 2.55 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSERIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)51.7112.60
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.291.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.852.55
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)93.0810.22