CLS vs. COHR: Celestica vs. Coherent Stock Comparison
How do Celestica (CLS) and Coherent (COHR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Celestica (CLS) and Coherent (COHR) both belong to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, though CLS is classified under Electronic Manufacturing Services while COHR falls under Electronic Components.
| Profile Item | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Celestica Inc. | Coherent Corp. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Technology Hardware & Equipment | Technology Hardware & Equipment |
| GICS Industry | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electronic Manufacturing Services | Electronic Components |
| Market Capitalization | 26.06 billion USD | 37.98 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 30, 1998 | October 2, 1987 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -30.98% | 48.11% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 108.72% | 90.06% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 80.82% | 28.94% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 80.89% | 91.27% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.16 | 2.19 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.47% | -62.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.61M | 7.56M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.44 | 0.48 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.59 | 0.70 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Celestica (CLS) at 30.23% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Coherent (COHR) at 9.27% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CLS.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
30.23%
- Max
- 42.47%
- CLS
- 30.23%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
9.27%
- Max
- 42.47%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- Median
- 11.00%
- COHR
- 9.27%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
Net Margin (TTM)
Coherent (COHR) at 12.18% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Celestica (CLS) at 6.83%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
6.83%
- Max
- 27.60%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- CLS
- 6.83%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
12.18%
- Max
- 27.60%
- COHR
- 12.18%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 7.91% and Coherent (COHR) at 16.30% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
7.91%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- CLS
- 7.91%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
16.30%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- COHR
- 16.30%
- Median
- 8.84%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 30.23% | 9.27% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.72% | 3.99% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.83% | 12.18% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.91% | 16.30% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 11.46% | 38.16% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Celestica (CLS) at 28.46% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Coherent (COHR) at 22.51% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for CLS.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Celestica (CLS) reports EPS growth of 98.34%, ranked against its industry; Coherent (COHR) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 28.46% | 22.51% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.56% | 11.32% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 98.34% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 82.39% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 and Coherent (COHR) at 2.29 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.61
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- CLS
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
2.29
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- COHR
- 2.29
- Median
- 1.95
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 0.17 and Coherent (COHR) at 0.37 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- CLS
- 0.17
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.37
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- COHR
- 0.37
- Median
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.61 | 2.29 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 0.37 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.72 | 1.56 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor Coherent (COHR) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- COHR
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor Coherent (COHR) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- COHR
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 19.50 and Coherent (COHR) at 39.92 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
19.50
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- CLS
- 19.50
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
39.92
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- COHR
- 39.92
- Median
- 26.39
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 and Coherent (COHR) at 4.80 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.43
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- Median
- 2.56
- CLS
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.80
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- COHR
- 4.80
- Median
- 2.56
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 4.19 and Coherent (COHR) at 3.35 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.19
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- CLS
- 4.19
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
COHR
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
3.35
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- COHR
- 3.35
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CLS | COHR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.50 | 39.92 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.43 | 4.80 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.19 | 3.35 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.08% | -4.44% |