Seek Returns logo

CLF vs. WLK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLF and WLK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLFWLK
Company NameCleveland-Cliffs Inc.Westlake Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningChemicals
Market Capitalization6.88 billion USD10.56 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973August 12, 2004
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLF and WLK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLF vs. WLK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLFWLK
5-Day Price Return9.45%3.13%
13-Week Price Return57.06%-3.65%
26-Week Price Return91.46%-12.60%
52-Week Price Return7.09%-43.40%
Month-to-Date Return13.93%6.89%
Year-to-Date Return47.87%-28.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume31.16M1.08M
3-Month Avg. Volume28.41M1.22M
3-Month Volatility56.43%48.85%
Beta1.980.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLF

-26.06%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

CLF has a negative Return on Equity of -26.06%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

WLK

-0.64%

Chemicals Industry

Max
29.52%
Q3
13.18%
Median
6.53%
Q1
1.35%
Min
-11.86%

WLK has a negative Return on Equity of -0.64%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLF

-9.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

CLF has a negative Net Profit Margin of -9.03%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

WLK

-0.57%

Chemicals Industry

Max
20.20%
Q3
9.15%
Median
3.94%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-10.43%

WLK has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.57%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLF

-9.54%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

CLF has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -9.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

WLK

0.89%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.82%
Median
7.98%
Q1
3.60%
Min
-7.61%

WLK’s Operating Profit Margin of 0.89% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLFWLK
Return on Equity (TTM)-26.06%-0.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)-8.44%-0.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-9.03%-0.57%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-9.54%0.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-5.29%11.20%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

2.04

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

CLF’s Current Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WLK

2.47

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
2.38
Median
1.69
Q1
1.42
Min
0.75

WLK’s Current Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

1.33

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.33, CLF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Metals & Mining industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

WLK

0.46

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.53
Q3
1.00
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

WLK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLF

-1.55

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

CLF has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.55. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

WLK

157.33

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
8.84
Q1
2.54
Min
-9.39

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 157.33, WLK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLFWLK
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.042.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.611.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.330.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1.55157.33

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLF vs. WLK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLF vs. WLK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WLK

2.65%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.67%
Median
2.44%
Q1
1.36%
Min
0.00%

WLK’s Dividend Yield of 2.65% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

CLF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WLK

43.85%

Chemicals Industry

Max
192.00%
Q3
108.95%
Median
57.38%
Q1
27.28%
Min
0.00%

WLK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.85% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLFWLK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%43.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLF

--

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

P/E Ratio data for CLF is currently unavailable.

WLK

--

Chemicals Industry

Max
49.43
Q3
32.03
Median
21.32
Q1
14.93
Min
8.66

P/E Ratio data for WLK is currently unavailable.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLF

0.37

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CLF’s P/S Ratio of 0.37 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

WLK

0.87

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.23
Median
1.00
Q1
0.55
Min
0.15

WLK’s P/S Ratio of 0.87 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

0.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

CLF’s P/B Ratio of 0.65 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

WLK

0.95

Chemicals Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.59
Median
1.50
Q1
0.95
Min
0.30

WLK’s P/B Ratio of 0.95 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CLF vs. WLK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLFWLK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.370.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.650.95
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.7524.90