Seek Returns logo

CL vs. MO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CL and MO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLMO
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyAltria Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsTobacco
Market Capitalization63.04 billion USD110.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1973January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CL and MO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CL vs. MO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLMO
5-Day Price Return-2.99%0.09%
13-Week Price Return-15.93%10.19%
26-Week Price Return-16.76%9.51%
52-Week Price Return-23.57%29.93%
Month-to-Date Return-2.43%-0.50%
Year-to-Date Return-14.20%25.70%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.88M6.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.16M8.51M
3-Month Volatility16.40%17.91%
Beta0.310.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MO

149.65%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
13.16%
Q1
5.02%
Min
4.04%

MO’s Return on Equity of 149.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.55% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MO

37.24%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
16.88%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.51%
Min
4.74%

MO’s Net Profit Margin of 37.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MO

46.84%

Tobacco Industry

Max
18.53%
Q3
15.03%
Median
11.76%
Q1
11.00%
Min
6.94%

MO’s Operating Profit Margin of 46.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLMO
Return on Equity (TTM)679.67%149.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.38%25.57%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.55%37.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%46.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.57%61.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MO

0.39

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.84
Median
1.26
Q1
0.79
Min
0.39

MO’s Current Ratio of 0.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Tobacco industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MO

8.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.58
Q1
0.07
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.67, MO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MO

36.48

Tobacco Industry

Max
306.04
Q3
126.21
Median
9.35
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

MO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.48 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLMO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.890.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)12.488.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.4936.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

CL vs. MO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CL vs. MO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CL

2.85%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.85% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MO

6.23%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.77%
Q3
6.12%
Median
5.06%
Q1
3.83%
Min
0.57%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.23%, MO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Tobacco industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MO

78.29%

Tobacco Industry

Max
78.29%
Q3
75.97%
Median
64.37%
Q1
50.14%
Min
49.96%

MO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.29% is in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLMO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.85%6.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.95%78.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CL

21.74

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

CL’s P/E Ratio of 21.74 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MO

12.57

Tobacco Industry

Max
44.17
Q3
36.23
Median
27.79
Q1
11.97
Min
9.91

MO’s P/E Ratio of 12.57 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CL

3.16

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.16 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MO

4.68

Tobacco Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
5.15
Median
2.97
Q1
1.39
Min
0.80

MO’s P/S Ratio of 4.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MO

27.09

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
3.34
Q1
1.97
Min
1.05

At 27.09, MO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CL vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLMO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.7412.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.164.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)104.9427.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.7712.66