Seek Returns logo

CL vs. EL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CL and EL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLEL
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization63.86 billion USD31.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1973November 17, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CL and EL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CL vs. EL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLEL
5-Day Price Return-1.47%3.27%
13-Week Price Return-12.06%9.06%
26-Week Price Return-13.14%33.74%
52-Week Price Return-22.88%-11.77%
Month-to-Date Return-4.91%-3.94%
Year-to-Date Return-12.07%17.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.18M3.11M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.14M3.92M
3-Month Volatility17.36%39.77%
Beta0.351.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EL

-25.95%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

EL has a negative Return on Equity of -25.95%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.55% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EL

-7.91%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

EL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EL

-5.48%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

EL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.48%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLEL
Return on Equity (TTM)679.67%-25.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.38%-5.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.55%-7.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%-5.48%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.57%73.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EL

1.30

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

EL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 aligns with the median group of the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EL

1.89

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.89, EL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EL

-3.28

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

EL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.28. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLEL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.891.30
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)12.481.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.49-3.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

CL vs. EL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CL vs. EL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CL

2.82%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.82% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EL

1.95%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Yield of 1.95% is consistent with its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EL

79.25%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

EL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.25% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLEL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.82%1.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.95%79.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CL

21.96

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

CL’s P/E Ratio of 21.96 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EL

--

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

P/E Ratio data for EL is currently unavailable.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CL

3.19

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.19 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EL

2.21

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

EL’s P/S Ratio of 2.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EL

7.52

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

EL’s P/B Ratio of 7.52 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CL vs. EL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLEL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.96--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.192.21
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)104.947.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9621.40