CHRW vs. PAC: C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. Grupo Aeroportuario Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but CHRW is classified in Air Freight & Logistics while PAC is classified in Transportation Infrastructure.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) trades as ordinary local shares, while Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Profile Item	CHRW	PAC
Name	C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico SAB de CV ADR
Country/Region	United States	Mexico
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Transportation	Transportation
GICS Industry	Air Freight & Logistics	Transportation Infrastructure
GICS Sub-Industry	Air Freight & Logistics	Airport Services
Market Capitalization	14.53 billion USD	14.79 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	October 16, 1997	February 27, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CHRW

PAC

GSPC

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Metric	CHRW	PAC
Total Return (1Y)	-12.63%	8.96%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	19.75%	26.61%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	8.87%	14.97%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CHRW

PAC

GSPC

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Metric	CHRW	PAC
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	43.97%	34.08%
Beta (5Y)	0.93	0.93
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-40.55%	-42.83%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.72M	139.78K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CHRW and PAC are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Metric	CHRW	PAC
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.38	0.14
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.47	0.19

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 38.93% and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 26.70% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

38.93%

Max: 45.08%
CHRW: 38.93%
Q3: 22.02%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -10.45%

PAC

Transportation industry group

26.70%

Max: 45.08%
PAC: 26.70%
Q3: 22.02%
Median: 13.94%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -10.45%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their ROE against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 29.51% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 3.67%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

3.67%

Max: 50.36%
Q3: 21.18%
Median: 5.58%
CHRW: 3.67%
Q1: 1.55%
Min: -11.37%

PAC

Transportation industry group

29.51%

Max: 50.36%
PAC: 29.51%
Q3: 21.18%
Median: 5.58%
Q1: 1.55%
Min: -11.37%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their net margin against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 43.26% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 5.66%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

5.66%

Max: 59.18%
Q3: 29.30%
Median: 11.50%
CHRW: 5.66%
Q1: 4.62%
Min: -8.91%

PAC

Transportation industry group

43.26%

Max: 59.18%
PAC: 43.26%
Q3: 29.30%
Median: 11.50%
Q1: 4.62%
Min: -8.91%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their operating margin against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Metric	CHRW	PAC
ROE (TTM)	38.93%	26.70%
ROA (TTM)	10.34%	10.48%
Net Margin (TTM)	3.67%	29.51%
Operating Margin (TTM)	5.66%	43.26%
Gross Margin (TTM)	8.34%	79.05%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 23.19% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at -8.42% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 25.13% and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 12.68% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Metric	CHRW	PAC
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-8.42%	23.19%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-13.05%	14.78%
EPS Growth (YoY)	25.13%	12.68%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-13.26%	2.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.34 and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 0.79 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.34

Max: 2.58
Q3: 1.62
CHRW: 1.34
Median: 1.16
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.22

PAC

Transportation industry group

0.79

Max: 2.58
Q3: 1.62
Median: 1.16
PAC: 0.79
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.22

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their current ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.36 and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 1.17 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.36

Max: 2.75
Q3: 1.37
CHRW: 1.36
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

PAC

Transportation industry group

1.17

Max: 2.75
Q3: 1.37
PAC: 1.17
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.00

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Metric	CHRW	PAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.34	0.79
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.36	1.17
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.95	1.92

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.96% pays an industry-typical yield; Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 8.46% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

1.96%

Max: 4.68%
Q3: 1.99%
CHRW: 1.96%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PAC

Transportation industry group

8.46%

PAC: 8.46%
Max: 4.68%
Q3: 1.99%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) reports a payout of 45.24%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

45.24%

Max: 100.89%
CHRW: 45.24%
Q3: 41.68%
Median: 20.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PAC

Transportation industry group

0.00%

Max: 100.89%
Q3: 41.68%
Median: 20.43%
PAC: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Metric	CHRW	PAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.96%	8.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	45.24%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 22.50 and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 21.16 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

22.50

Max: 46.76
Q3: 30.87
CHRW: 22.50
Median: 20.58
Q1: 10.44
Min: 0.00

PAC

Transportation industry group

21.16

Max: 46.76
Q3: 30.87
PAC: 21.16
Median: 20.58
Q1: 10.44
Min: 0.00

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 0.42 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 0.80 prices around its industry’s middle — PAC costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

0.80

Max: 4.35
Q3: 2.07
Median: 0.93
CHRW: 0.80
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.04

PAC

Transportation industry group

0.42

Max: 4.35
Q3: 2.07
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.53
PAC: 0.42
Min: 0.04

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 9.20 and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC) at 719.39 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

CHRW

Transportation industry group

9.20

CHRW: 9.20
Max: 6.29
Q3: 3.39
Median: 1.90
Q1: 1.03
Min: -2.07

PAC

Transportation industry group

719.39

PAC: 719.39
Max: 6.29
Q3: 3.39
Median: 1.90
Q1: 1.03
Min: -2.07

C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) vs. Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Grupo Aeroportuario (PAC)
Metric	CHRW	PAC
P/E Ratio (TTM)	22.50	21.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.80	0.42
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	9.20	719.39
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.61%	76.79%