CHRW vs. NSC: C.H. Robinson Worldwide vs. Norfolk Southern Stock Comparison
How do C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Norfolk Southern (NSC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) and Norfolk Southern (NSC) both fall under the Transportation industry group, but CHRW is classified in Air Freight & Logistics while NSC is classified in Ground Transportation.
| Profile Item | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. | Norfolk Southern Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Transportation | Transportation |
| GICS Industry | Air Freight & Logistics | Ground Transportation |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Air Freight & Logistics | Rail Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 14.53 billion USD | 71.86 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 16, 1997 | June 2, 1982 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -12.63% | 16.63% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.75% | 21.35% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.87% | 4.94% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 43.97% | 21.75% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.19 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -40.55% | -35.64% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.72M | 1.02M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.38 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.47 | 0.86 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 38.93% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 16.84% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CHRW.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
38.93%
- Max
- 45.08%
- CHRW
- 38.93%
- Q3
- 22.02%
- Median
- 13.94%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -10.45%
NSC
Transportation industry group
16.84%
- Max
- 45.08%
- Q3
- 22.02%
- NSC
- 16.84%
- Median
- 13.94%
- Q1
- 2.89%
- Min
- -10.45%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 3.67% and Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 20.71% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
3.67%
- Max
- 50.36%
- Q3
- 21.18%
- Median
- 5.58%
- CHRW
- 3.67%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -11.37%
NSC
Transportation industry group
20.71%
- Max
- 50.36%
- Q3
- 21.18%
- NSC
- 20.71%
- Median
- 5.58%
- Q1
- 1.55%
- Min
- -11.37%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 35.42% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 5.66%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
5.66%
- Max
- 59.18%
- Q3
- 29.30%
- Median
- 11.50%
- CHRW
- 5.66%
- Q1
- 4.62%
- Min
- -8.91%
NSC
Transportation industry group
35.42%
- Max
- 59.18%
- NSC
- 35.42%
- Q3
- 29.30%
- Median
- 11.50%
- Q1
- 4.62%
- Min
- -8.91%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 38.93% | 16.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.34% | 6.03% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 3.67% | 20.71% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.66% | 35.42% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 8.34% | 44.68% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 0.47% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at -8.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 25.13% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 10.20% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CHRW.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.42% | 0.47% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.05% | -1.50% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 25.13% | 10.20% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.26% | -2.79% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.34 and Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 0.90 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.34
- Max
- 2.58
- Q3
- 1.62
- CHRW
- 1.34
- Median
- 1.16
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.22
NSC
Transportation industry group
0.90
- Max
- 2.58
- Q3
- 1.62
- Median
- 1.16
- NSC
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.78
- Min
- 0.22
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.36 and Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 1.02 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.36
- Max
- 2.75
- Q3
- 1.37
- CHRW
- 1.36
- Median
- 0.78
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
NSC
Transportation industry group
1.02
- Max
- 2.75
- Q3
- 1.37
- NSC
- 1.02
- Median
- 0.78
- Q1
- 0.35
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.34 | 0.90 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.36 | 1.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.95 | 2.68 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 1.96% and Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 1.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
1.96%
- Max
- 4.68%
- Q3
- 1.99%
- CHRW
- 1.96%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NSC
Transportation industry group
1.65%
- Max
- 4.68%
- Q3
- 1.99%
- NSC
- 1.65%
- Median
- 0.74%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 45.24% and Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 45.26% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
45.24%
- Max
- 100.89%
- CHRW
- 45.24%
- Q3
- 41.68%
- Median
- 20.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NSC
Transportation industry group
45.26%
- Max
- 100.89%
- NSC
- 45.26%
- Q3
- 41.68%
- Median
- 20.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.96% | 1.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 45.24% | 45.26% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 22.50 and Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 26.82 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
22.50
- Max
- 46.76
- Q3
- 30.87
- CHRW
- 22.50
- Median
- 20.58
- Q1
- 10.44
- Min
- 0.00
NSC
Transportation industry group
26.82
- Max
- 46.76
- Q3
- 30.87
- NSC
- 26.82
- Median
- 20.58
- Q1
- 10.44
- Min
- 0.00
P/S Ratio (TTM)
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 0.80 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 5.54 clears its benchmark range — NSC looks notably rich on sales.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
0.80
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 2.07
- Median
- 0.93
- CHRW
- 0.80
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.04
NSC
Transportation industry group
5.54
- NSC
- 5.54
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 2.07
- Median
- 0.93
- Q1
- 0.53
- Min
- 0.04
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Norfolk Southern (NSC) at 4.30 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) at 9.20 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CHRW
Transportation industry group
9.20
- CHRW
- 9.20
- Max
- 6.29
- Q3
- 3.39
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- -2.07
NSC
Transportation industry group
4.30
- Max
- 6.29
- NSC
- 4.30
- Q3
- 3.39
- Median
- 1.90
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- -2.07
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CHRW | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 22.50 | 26.82 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 5.54 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 9.20 | 4.30 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.61% | 2.25% |