Seek Returns

CG vs. SCHW: Carlyle vs. Charles Schwab Stock Comparison

How do Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CG is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while SCHW falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Company profile comparison for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
Profile ItemCGSCHW
NameThe Carlyle Group Inc.The Charles Schwab Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryAsset Management & Custody BanksInvestment Banking & Brokerage
Market Capitalization14.04 billion USD158.22 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateMay 3, 2012September 22, 1987
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CG
SCHW
GSPC
Loading price history…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
MetricCGSCHW
Total Return (1Y)-17.79%-0.80%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)15.29%21.35%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-3.77%4.31%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CG
SCHW
GSPC
Loading price history…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
MetricCGSCHW
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)37.89%26.01%
Beta (5Y)1.820.74
Max Drawdown (5Y)-56.75%-49.70%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.48M8.22M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CG and SCHW are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
MetricCGSCHW
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.58-0.20
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.81-0.26

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Carlyle (CG) at 5.23% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 21.12% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CG

Financial Services industry group

5.23%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
CG
5.23%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

21.12%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
SCHW
21.12%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 39.33% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Carlyle (CG) at 12.81%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CG

Financial Services industry group

12.81%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
CG
12.81%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

39.33%

Max
62.84%
SCHW
39.33%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Carlyle (CG) reports a negative operating margin of -52.93%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Charles Schwab (SCHW) reports 52.67%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CG

Financial Services industry group

-52.93%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
CG
-52.93%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

52.67%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
SCHW
52.67%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
MetricCGSCHW
ROE (TTM)5.23%21.12%
ROA (TTM)1.27%2.16%
Net Margin (TTM)12.81%39.33%
Operating Margin (TTM)-52.93%52.67%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 22.01% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlyle (CG) at -5.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 55.52% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Carlyle (CG) at -21.30% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for SCHW.

Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
MetricCGSCHW
Revenue Growth (YoY)-5.56%22.01%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-1.43%4.83%
EPS Growth (YoY)-21.30%55.52%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-13.34%9.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Charles Schwab (SCHW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
MetricCGSCHW
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Carlyle (CG) at 3.50% and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 1.33% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CG

Financial Services industry group

3.50%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
CG
3.50%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

1.33%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
SCHW
1.33%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Carlyle (CG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.37%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Charles Schwab (SCHW) reports 21.03%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CG

Financial Services industry group

147.37%

Max
241.07%
CG
147.37%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

21.03%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
SCHW
21.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
MetricCGSCHW
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.50%1.33%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)147.37%21.03%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 15.64 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 40.93 sits in the richer quartile — CG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CG

Financial Services industry group

40.93

Max
45.85
CG
40.93
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

15.64

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
SCHW
15.64
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Carlyle (CG) at 5.06 and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 5.85 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

CG

Financial Services industry group

5.06

Max
9.23
CG
5.06
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

5.85

Max
9.23
SCHW
5.85
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Carlyle (CG) at 2.81 and Charles Schwab (SCHW) at 3.08 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

CG

Financial Services industry group

2.81

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
CG
2.81
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

SCHW

Financial Services industry group

3.08

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
SCHW
3.08
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Charles Schwab (SCHW): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Charles Schwab (SCHW)
MetricCGSCHW
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.9315.64
P/S Ratio (TTM)5.065.85
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.813.08
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----