CG vs. ICE: Carlyle vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison
How do Carlyle (CG) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carlyle (CG) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CG is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while ICE falls under Financial Exchanges & Data.
| Profile Item | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Carlyle Group Inc. | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Asset Management & Custody Banks | Financial Exchanges & Data |
| Market Capitalization | 14.04 billion USD | 96.27 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 3, 2012 | November 16, 2005 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -17.79% | 18.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.29% | 18.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -3.77% | 6.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.89% | 25.87% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.82 | 0.82 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.75% | -33.97% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.48M | 3.09M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.58 | 0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.81 | 0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 5.23% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
CG
Financial Services industry group
5.23%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- CG
- 5.23%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
14.40%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- ICE
- 14.40%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Carlyle (CG) at 12.81%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CG
Financial Services industry group
12.81%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- CG
- 12.81%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
38.14%
- Max
- 62.84%
- ICE
- 38.14%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Carlyle (CG) reports a negative operating margin of -52.93%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports 52.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
-52.93%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
- CG
- -52.93%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
52.77%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- ICE
- 52.77%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.23% | 14.40% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.27% | 2.28% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.81% | 38.14% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -52.93% | 52.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlyle (CG) at -5.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Carlyle (CG) at -21.30% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 20.71% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.56% | 7.47% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.43% | 9.47% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -21.30% | 20.71% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.34% | 30.77% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 3.50% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 1.17% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CG
Financial Services industry group
3.50%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- CG
- 3.50%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
1.17%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- ICE
- 1.17%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Carlyle (CG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.37%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports 27.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
147.37%
- Max
- 241.07%
- CG
- 147.37%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ICE
Financial Services industry group
27.79%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- ICE
- 27.79%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.50% | 1.17% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 147.37% | 27.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 40.93 sits in the richer quartile — CG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CG
Financial Services industry group
40.93
- Max
- 45.85
- CG
- 40.93
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
ICE
Financial Services industry group
23.47
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- ICE
- 23.47
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 5.06 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CG
Financial Services industry group
5.06
- Max
- 9.23
- CG
- 5.06
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
ICE
Financial Services industry group
8.82
- Max
- 9.23
- ICE
- 8.82
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Carlyle (CG) at 2.81 and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CG
Financial Services industry group
2.81
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- CG
- 2.81
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
ICE
Financial Services industry group
3.22
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- ICE
- 3.22
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CG | ICE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 40.93 | 23.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.06 | 8.82 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.81 | 3.22 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |