CG vs. GS: Carlyle vs. Goldman Sachs Stock Comparison
How do Carlyle (CG) and Goldman Sachs (GS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carlyle (CG) and Goldman Sachs (GS) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CG is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while GS falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Profile Item | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Carlyle Group Inc. | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Asset Management & Custody Banks | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 14.04 billion USD | 249.73 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 3, 2012 | May 4, 1999 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -17.79% | 17.85% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.29% | 44.69% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -3.77% | 20.41% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.89% | 33.28% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.82 | 1.27 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.75% | -30.90% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.48M | 2.10M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.58 | 0.41 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.81 | 0.59 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 5.23% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
CG
Financial Services industry group
5.23%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- CG
- 5.23%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
GS
Financial Services industry group
17.71%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- GS
- 17.71%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Carlyle (CG) at 12.81%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CG
Financial Services industry group
12.81%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- CG
- 12.81%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
GS
Financial Services industry group
31.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- GS
- 31.21%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Carlyle (CG) reports a negative operating margin of -52.93%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports 38.37%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
-52.93%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
- CG
- -52.93%
GS
Financial Services industry group
38.37%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- GS
- 38.37%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.23% | 17.71% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.27% | 1.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.81% | 31.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -52.93% | 38.37% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlyle (CG) at -5.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Carlyle (CG) at -21.30% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.56% | 8.92% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.43% | 7.16% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -21.30% | 26.59% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.34% | 19.52% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 3.50% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CG
Financial Services industry group
3.50%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- CG
- 3.50%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GS
Financial Services industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- GS
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Carlyle (CG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.37%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Goldman Sachs (GS) reports 25.88%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
147.37%
- Max
- 241.07%
- CG
- 147.37%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GS
Financial Services industry group
25.88%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- GS
- 25.88%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.50% | 2.07% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 147.37% | 25.88% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 40.93 sits in the richer quartile — CG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CG
Financial Services industry group
40.93
- Max
- 45.85
- CG
- 40.93
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
GS
Financial Services industry group
12.45
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- GS
- 12.45
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 5.06 sits in the pricier quartile — CG costs more per dollar of sales.
CG
Financial Services industry group
5.06
- Max
- 9.23
- CG
- 5.06
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
GS
Financial Services industry group
3.52
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- GS
- 3.52
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Carlyle (CG) at 2.81 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CG
Financial Services industry group
2.81
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- CG
- 2.81
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
GS
Financial Services industry group
2.36
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- GS
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CG | GS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 40.93 | 12.45 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.06 | 3.52 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.81 | 2.36 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |