Seek Returns logo

CFLT vs. CLSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CFLT and CLSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCFLTCLSK
Company NameConfluent, Inc.CleanSpark, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSoftware
Market Capitalization5.96 billion USD2.80 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqCM
Listing DateJune 24, 2021November 16, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CFLT and CLSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CFLT vs. CLSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCFLTCLSK
5-Day Price Return2.13%-7.00%
13-Week Price Return-22.61%3.64%
26-Week Price Return-42.15%-3.95%
52-Week Price Return-14.32%-13.00%
Month-to-Date Return-2.45%-12.31%
Year-to-Date Return-38.16%8.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.25M21.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.05M26.10M
3-Month Volatility75.14%70.60%
Beta0.953.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CFLT

-31.29%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CFLT has a negative Return on Equity of -31.29%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CLSK

15.51%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CLSK’s Return on Equity of 15.51% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-29.27%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

CFLT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -29.27%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CLSK

47.98%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 47.98% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CFLT

-37.29%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

CFLT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -37.29%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CLSK

39.96%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.96% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCFLTCLSK
Return on Equity (TTM)-31.29%15.51%
Return on Assets (TTM)-11.52%11.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-29.27%47.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-37.29%39.96%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.22%52.05%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

3.98

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CFLT’s Current Ratio of 3.98 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CLSK

4.37

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

1.03

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CFLT’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Software industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.03. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CLSK

0.38

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

-87.07

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CFLT has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -87.07. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CLSK

-46.66

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCFLTCLSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.984.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.834.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.030.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-87.07-46.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

CFLT vs. CLSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CFLT vs. CLSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLSK

0.18%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CFLT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCFLTCLSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for CFLT is currently unavailable.

CLSK

9.24

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CLSK’s P/E Ratio of 9.24 is below the typical range for the Software industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CFLT

5.60

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

CFLT’s P/S Ratio of 5.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLSK

4.43

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CFLT

7.98

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CFLT’s P/B Ratio of 7.98 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLSK

1.44

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CLSK’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CFLT vs. CLSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCFLTCLSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--9.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.604.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.981.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)120.4346.30