CELH vs. CL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at CELH and CL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CL stands out with 75.32 billion USD in market value—about 7.71× CELH’s market cap of 9.76 billion USD.
CELH’s beta of 1.63 points to much larger expected swings compared to CL’s calmer 0.39, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | CELH | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Celsius Holdings, Inc. | Colgate-Palmolive Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Defensive | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Household & Personal Products |
| CEO | Mr. John Fieldly CPA | Mr. Noel R. Wallace |
| Price | 37.88 USD | 92.94 USD |
| Market Cap | 9.76 billion USD | 75.32 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.63 | 0.39 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | January 22, 2007 | May 2, 1973 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of CELH and CL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between CELH and CL, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | CELH | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 79.77 | 26.23 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.28 | 3.59 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.35 | 3.78 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 20.11 | 209.36 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 47.44 | 21.72 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 66.10 | 17.10 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.62 | 4.13 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 42.79 | 23.79 |
Dividend Comparison
CELH offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while CL provides a 2.17% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | CELH | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.17% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of CELH and CL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- CL’s current ratio of 0.85 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas CELH at 3.38 maintains healthy liquidity.
- CL posts a quick ratio of 0.54, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while CELH at 3.04 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- CL is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 22.78), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to CELH at 0.04, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
| Symbol | CELH | CL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.38 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.04 | 0.54 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.04 | 22.78 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 14.54 |