Seek Returns logo

CELH vs. CL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CELH and CL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCELHCL
Company NameCelsius Holdings, Inc.Colgate-Palmolive Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesHousehold Products
Market Capitalization16.22 billion USD63.04 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateJanuary 22, 2007May 2, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CELH and CL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CELH vs. CL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCELHCL
5-Day Price Return6.81%-0.40%
13-Week Price Return36.46%-14.83%
26-Week Price Return74.75%-18.75%
52-Week Price Return118.29%-20.87%
Month-to-Date Return9.43%-2.43%
Year-to-Date Return138.84%-14.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.26M6.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.30M5.21M
3-Month Volatility51.26%17.00%
Beta0.990.30

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CELH

9.04%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

7.91%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.55% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CELH

10.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.40% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCELHCL
Return on Equity (TTM)9.04%679.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.77%17.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.91%14.55%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.40%21.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)50.53%60.57%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

2.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

CELH’s Current Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

0.42

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCELHCL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.110.89
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.700.57
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.4212.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-55.0020.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

CELH vs. CL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CELH vs. CL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CELH

0.17%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CL

2.84%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.84% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CELH

13.64%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.64% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCELHCL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%2.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)13.64%61.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CELH

122.36

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

At 122.36, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CL

21.79

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

CL’s P/E Ratio of 21.79 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CELH

9.67

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 9.67, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CL

3.17

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.17 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CELH

5.72

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

CELH’s P/B Ratio of 5.72 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CELH vs. CL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCELHCL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)122.3621.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.673.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.72104.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)76.4618.81