CDNS vs. TEAM: Cadence Design Systems vs. Atlassian Stock Comparison
How do Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) and Atlassian (TEAM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) and Atlassian (TEAM) are both classified in the Application Software sub-industry within the broader Software industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | Atlassian Corporation Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | Software | Software |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Application Software | Application Software |
| Market Capitalization | 87.78 billion USD | 38.90 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | June 10, 1987 | December 9, 2015 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.07% | -2.49% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.32% | -3.42% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.93% | -19.11% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 42.21% | 80.29% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 1.19 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -34.21% | -87.16% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.41M | 3.45M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | -0.08 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | -0.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 22.87% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Atlassian (TEAM) at 7.75% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CDNS.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
22.87%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CDNS
- 22.87%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
7.75%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- TEAM
- 7.75%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
Net Margin (TTM)
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 22.52% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Atlassian (TEAM) at 1.28%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
22.52%
- Max
- 41.17%
- CDNS
- 22.52%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
1.28%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- TEAM
- 1.28%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 28.93% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Atlassian (TEAM) at 10.65%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
28.93%
- Max
- 46.89%
- CDNS
- 28.93%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
10.65%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- TEAM
- 10.65%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 22.87% | 7.75% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.52% | 6.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 22.52% | 1.28% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.93% | 10.65% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 85.68% | 85.83% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Atlassian (TEAM) at 26.02% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.12% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for TEAM.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports EPS growth of 5.45%, ranked against its industry; Atlassian (TEAM) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 14.12% | 26.02% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 14.14% | 22.97% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 5.45% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.53% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 1.36 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Atlassian (TEAM) at 0.72 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for TEAM.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
1.36
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- CDNS
- 1.36
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
0.72
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- TEAM
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 0.41 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Atlassian (TEAM) at 1.35 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
0.41
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- CDNS
- 0.41
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
1.35
- Max
- 2.52
- TEAM
- 1.35
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.36 | 0.72 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.41 | 1.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.57 | 0.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Atlassian (TEAM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- CDNS
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- TEAM
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Atlassian (TEAM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- CDNS
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- TEAM
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 63.60 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Atlassian (TEAM) at 465.70 is richer still, above its industry range.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
63.60
- Max
- 112.94
- CDNS
- 63.60
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
465.70
- TEAM
- 465.70
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Atlassian (TEAM) at 5.63 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.31 sits in the pricier quartile — CDNS costs more per dollar of sales.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
14.31
- Max
- 17.91
- CDNS
- 14.31
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
5.63
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- TEAM
- 5.63
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 12.77 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Atlassian (TEAM) at 42.54 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CDNS
Software & Services industry group
12.77
- Max
- 16.63
- CDNS
- 12.77
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
TEAM
Software & Services industry group
42.54
- TEAM
- 42.54
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CDNS | TEAM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 63.60 | 465.70 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 14.31 | 5.63 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 12.77 | 42.54 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 5.17% |