CDNS vs. QNT: Cadence Design Systems vs. Quantinuum Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) and Quantinuum (QNT) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but CDNS is classified in Software while QNT is classified in IT Services.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) has been public since June 10, 1987, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Quantinuum (QNT) listed only on June 4, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative beta of -2.69, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) has a non-negative beta of 1.09.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both CDNS and QNT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) earns 22.87% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no ROE this period.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 22.52% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.00%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative operating margin of -6,939.56%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 28.93%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Quantinuum (QNT) at 34.61% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.12% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for QNT.

Only one side can be read here: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports EPS growth of 5.45%, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 1.36 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 15.49 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 0.41 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) trades at 63.60 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantinuum (QNT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Both look expensive on sales: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.31 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Quantinuum (QNT) at 441.11 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Both look rich against book: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 12.77 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Quantinuum (QNT) at 64.89 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics