CCK vs. NEM: Crown Holdings vs. Newmont Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CCK is classified in Containers & Packaging while NEM is classified in Metals & Mining.

Company profile comparison for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Profile Item	CCK	NEM
Name	Crown Holdings Inc.	Newmont Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry Group	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Metals & Mining
GICS Sub-Industry	Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers	Gold
Market Capitalization	13.11 billion USD	125.65 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCK

NEM

GSPC

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	CCK	NEM
Total Return (1Y)	28.01%	51.53%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	17.05%	57.50%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	4.17%	20.41%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCK

NEM

GSPC

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	CCK	NEM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	25.51%	48.55%
Beta (5Y)	0.53	0.51
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-48.28%	-62.40%
Avg. Volume (3M)	877.28K	6.95M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CCK and NEM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	CCK	NEM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.93	0.97
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.46	1.41

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 27.13% and Newmont (NEM) at 27.26% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

CCK

Materials industry group

27.13%

Max: 52.88%
CCK: 27.13%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

NEM

Materials industry group

27.26%

Max: 52.88%
NEM: 27.26%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their ROE against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Newmont (NEM) at 34.73% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Crown Holdings (CCK) at 5.78%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CCK

Materials industry group

5.78%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
CCK: 5.78%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

NEM

Materials industry group

34.73%

Max: 38.66%
NEM: 34.73%
Q3: 15.98%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their net margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Newmont (NEM) at 49.99% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Crown Holdings (CCK) at 11.96%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CCK

Materials industry group

11.96%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
CCK: 11.96%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

NEM

Materials industry group

49.99%

Max: 66.70%
NEM: 49.99%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	CCK	NEM
ROE (TTM)	27.13%	27.26%
ROA (TTM)	7.05%	16.37%
Net Margin (TTM)	5.78%	34.73%
Operating Margin (TTM)	11.96%	49.99%
Gross Margin (TTM)	20.18%	68.04%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.78% and Newmont (NEM) at 21.34% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Newmont (NEM) at 118.84% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 79.72% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NEM.

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	CCK	NEM
Revenue Growth (YoY)	4.78%	21.34%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-1.51%	23.91%
EPS Growth (YoY)	79.72%	118.84%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	2.12%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Newmont (NEM) at 2.45 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.14 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CCK.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.14

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
CCK: 1.14
Min: 0.16

NEM

Materials industry group

2.45

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
NEM: 2.45
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.16

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Newmont (NEM) at 0.16 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.75

Max: 1.98
CCK: 1.75
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

NEM

Materials industry group

0.16

Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
NEM: 0.16
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	CCK	NEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	2.45
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.75	0.16
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.57	-0.18

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.08% and Newmont (NEM) at 0.87% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.08%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
CCK: 1.08%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NEM

Materials industry group

0.87%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
NEM: 0.87%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 18.27% and Newmont (NEM) at 11.95% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CCK

Materials industry group

18.27%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
CCK: 18.27%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NEM

Materials industry group

11.95%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
NEM: 11.95%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	CCK	NEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.08%	0.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	18.27%	11.95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 16.92 and Newmont (NEM) at 14.03 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CCK

Materials industry group

16.92

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
CCK: 16.92
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

NEM

Materials industry group

14.03

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
NEM: 14.03
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Crown Holdings (CCK) at 0.95 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Newmont (NEM) at 4.72 sits in the pricier quartile — NEM costs more per dollar of sales.

CCK

Materials industry group

0.95

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
CCK: 0.95
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

NEM

Materials industry group

4.72

Max: 9.62
NEM: 4.72
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Newmont (NEM) at 3.53 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.41 carries an above-peer premium to book — CCK is pricier on assets.

CCK

Materials industry group

4.41

Max: 6.59
CCK: 4.41
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

NEM

Materials industry group

3.53

Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
NEM: 3.53
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Newmont (NEM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Newmont (NEM)
Metric	CCK	NEM
P/E Ratio (TTM)	16.92	14.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.95	4.72
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	4.41	3.53
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	5.53%	7.29%