CCK vs. CX: Crown Holdings vs. CEMEX Stock Comparison
How do Crown Holdings (CCK) and CEMEX (CX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Crown Holdings (CCK) and CEMEX (CX) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CCK is classified in Containers & Packaging while CX is classified in Construction Materials.
Crown Holdings (CCK) trades as ordinary local shares, while CEMEX (CX) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Crown Holdings Inc. | Cemex S.A.B. de C.V. Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Mexico |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Containers & Packaging | Construction Materials |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers | Construction Materials |
| Market Capitalization | 13.11 billion USD | 15.47 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | September 15, 1999 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 28.01% | 7.57% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.05% | 17.84% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 4.17% | 10.81% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
CEMEX (CX) has an aggressive beta of 1.57, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Crown Holdings (CCK) is defensive at 0.53 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.51% | 36.82% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 1.57 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -48.28% | -53.08% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 877.28K | 7.01M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.93 | 0.09 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.46 | 0.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 27.13% sits in the top ROE quartile, while CEMEX (CX) at 5.17% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CCK.
CCK
Materials industry group
27.13%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CCK
- 27.13%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
CX
Materials industry group
5.17%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- CX
- 5.17%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 5.78% and CEMEX (CX) at 3.60% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CCK
Materials industry group
5.78%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- CCK
- 5.78%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
CX
Materials industry group
3.60%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- CX
- 3.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 11.96% and CEMEX (CX) at 14.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CCK
Materials industry group
11.96%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- CCK
- 11.96%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
CX
Materials industry group
14.77%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CX
- 14.77%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.13% | 5.17% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.05% | 5.07% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.78% | 3.60% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.96% | 14.77% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.18% | 33.48% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.78% and CEMEX (CX) at 0.43% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 79.72% and CEMEX (CX) at 2.35% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.78% | 0.43% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.51% | 3.13% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 79.72% | 2.35% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.12% | 4.14% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.14 and CEMEX (CX) at 0.95 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.14
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CCK
- 1.14
- Min
- 0.16
CX
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CX
- 0.95
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
CEMEX (CX) at 0.46 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.75
- Max
- 1.98
- CCK
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
CX
Materials industry group
0.46
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CX
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.14 | 0.95 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.75 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 1.60 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CEMEX (CX) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Crown Holdings (CCK) reports a yield of 1.08%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.08%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- CCK
- 1.08%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CX
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- CX
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 18.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CEMEX (CX) at 67.86% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CCK
Materials industry group
18.27%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- CCK
- 18.27%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CX
Materials industry group
67.86%
- Max
- 83.62%
- CX
- 67.86%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 18.27% | 67.86% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 16.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CEMEX (CX) at 67.00 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CX’s trailing earnings.
CCK
Materials industry group
16.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- CCK
- 16.92
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
CX
Materials industry group
67.00
- CX
- 67.00
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 0.95 and CEMEX (CX) at 0.89 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CCK
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CCK
- 0.95
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
CX
Materials industry group
0.89
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CX
- 0.89
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
CEMEX (CX) at 1.20 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.41 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.
CCK
Materials industry group
4.41
- Max
- 6.59
- CCK
- 4.41
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
CX
Materials industry group
1.20
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- CX
- 1.20
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CCK | CX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.92 | 67.00 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.95 | 0.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.41 | 1.20 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | 8.86% |