Seek Returns

CCJ vs. WMB: Cameco vs. Williams Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while WMB falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
Profile ItemCCJWMB
NameCameco CorporationThe Williams Companies, Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD80.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
MetricCCJWMB
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%14.81%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%28.70%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%23.72%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
MetricCCJWMB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%26.38%
Beta (5Y)1.180.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-23.01%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M7.88M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and WMB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
MetricCCJWMB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.460.40
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.640.56

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% and Williams (WMB) at 18.31% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

WMB

Energy industry group

18.31%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
WMB
18.31%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Williams (WMB) at 24.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

WMB

Energy industry group

24.66%

Max
56.92%
WMB
24.66%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and Williams (WMB) at 32.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

WMB

Energy industry group

32.69%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WMB
32.69%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
MetricCCJWMB
ROE (TTM)5.68%18.31%
ROA (TTM)2.79%4.59%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%24.66%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%32.69%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%63.05%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% and Williams (WMB) at 13.78% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Williams (WMB) at 17.58%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
MetricCCJWMB
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%13.78%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%2.91%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%17.58%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%8.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Williams (WMB) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

WMB

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
WMB
0.75
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 1.58 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

1.58

Max
1.75
WMB
1.58
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
MetricCCJWMB
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.550.75
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.141.58
Net Debt / EBITDA0.194.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and Williams (WMB) at 3.23% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

3.23%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
WMB
3.23%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Williams (WMB) at 81.69% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

81.69%

Max
133.24%
WMB
81.69%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
MetricCCJWMB
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%3.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%81.69%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Williams (WMB) at 25.23 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 is richer still, above its industry range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

WMB

Energy industry group

25.23

Max
39.54
WMB
25.23
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 and Williams (WMB) at 6.32 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

6.32

WMB
6.32
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 and Williams (WMB) at 5.11 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

WMB

Energy industry group

5.11

WMB
5.11
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Williams (WMB)
MetricCCJWMB
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.0325.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.936.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.035.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%-3.56%