Seek Returns

CCJ vs. WDS: Cameco vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while WDS falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.

Cameco (CCJ) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
Profile ItemCCJWDS
NameCameco CorporationWoodside Energy Group Ltd ADR
Country/RegionCanadaAustralia
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD40.00 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
WDS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricCCJWDS
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%30.30%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%5.67%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%11.65%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
WDS
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricCCJWDS
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%33.53%
Beta (5Y)1.180.38
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-48.77%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M570.04K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and WDS are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricCCJWDS
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.460.78
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.641.11

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

WDS

Energy industry group

7.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
WDS
7.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

WDS

Energy industry group

22.21%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
WDS
22.21%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

WDS

Energy industry group

23.91%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WDS
23.91%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricCCJWDS
ROE (TTM)5.68%7.68%
ROA (TTM)2.79%2.83%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%22.21%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%23.91%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%34.92%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricCCJWDS
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%-1.48%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%-8.26%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%-24.02%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%-30.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

WDS

Energy industry group

1.39

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
WDS
1.39
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

WDS

Energy industry group

0.33

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
WDS
0.33
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricCCJWDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.551.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.33
Net Debt / EBITDA0.191.15

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WDS

Energy industry group

5.41%

Max
8.57%
WDS
5.41%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WDS

Energy industry group

69.78%

Max
133.24%
WDS
69.78%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricCCJWDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%5.41%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%69.78%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

WDS

Energy industry group

13.15

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
WDS
13.15
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on sales: Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 prices even higher, above its industry range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

WDS

Energy industry group

2.89

Max
5.40
WDS
2.89
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices above its benchmark range — CCJ looks rich relative to book.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

WDS

Energy industry group

1.11

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
WDS
1.11
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Woodside Energy (WDS): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Woodside Energy (WDS)
MetricCCJWDS
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.0313.15
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.932.89
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.031.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%1.41%