CCJ vs. TTE: Cameco vs. TotalEnergies Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while TTE falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Profile Item	CCJ	TTE
Name	Cameco Corporation	TotalEnergies SE
Country/Region	Canada	France
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-Industry	Coal & Consumable Fuels	Integrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization	31.05 billion USD	192.81 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 14, 1996	October 25, 1991
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ

TTE

GSPC

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	CCJ	TTE
Total Return (1Y)	-18.97%	47.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	21.14%	16.28%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	22.20%	17.77%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ

TTE

GSPC

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	CCJ	TTE
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	51.10%	25.22%
Beta (5Y)	1.18	0.15
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-49.04%	-26.16%
Avg. Volume (3M)	3.27M	1.80M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CCJ and TTE are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	CCJ	TTE
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.46	1.70
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.64	2.52

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 17.83% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
CCJ: 5.68%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

TTE

Energy industry group

17.83%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
TTE: 17.83%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 10.46% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
CCJ: 11.43%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

TTE

Energy industry group

10.46%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
TTE: 10.46%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 24.51% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
Median: 18.73%
CCJ: 9.23%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

TTE

Energy industry group

24.51%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
TTE: 24.51%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	CCJ	TTE
ROE (TTM)	5.68%	17.83%
ROA (TTM)	2.79%	7.19%
Net Margin (TTM)	11.43%	10.46%
Operating Margin (TTM)	9.23%	24.51%
Gross Margin (TTM)	33.83%	39.18%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while TotalEnergies (TTE) at -6.78% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than TotalEnergies (TTE) at -13.60%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	CCJ	TTE
Revenue Growth (YoY)	11.04%	-6.78%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	23.07%	-11.53%
EPS Growth (YoY)	246.15%	-13.60%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	83.08%	-9.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TotalEnergies (TTE) at 1.11 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max: 3.64
CCJ: 2.55
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

TTE

Energy industry group

1.11

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
TTE: 1.11
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while TotalEnergies (TTE) at 0.46 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.30
CCJ: 0.14
Min: 0.00

TTE

Energy industry group

0.46

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
TTE: 0.46
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	CCJ	TTE
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.55	1.11
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.14	0.46
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.19	0.52

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TotalEnergies (TTE) at 4.58% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TTE the richer one.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
Median: 1.71%
CCJ: 0.35%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTE

Energy industry group

4.58%

Max: 8.57%
TTE: 4.58%
Q3: 3.58%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 39.93% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
CCJ: 26.37%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTE

Energy industry group

39.93%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
TTE: 39.93%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	CCJ	TTE
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.35%	4.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	26.37%	39.93%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

TotalEnergies (TTE) at 8.76 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ: 108.03
Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

TTE

Energy industry group

8.76

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
TTE: 8.76
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

TotalEnergies (TTE) at 0.90 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ: 8.93
Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

TTE

Energy industry group

0.90

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
Median: 1.69
TTE: 0.90
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

TotalEnergies (TTE) at 1.46 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices above its benchmark range — CCJ looks rich relative to book.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ: 6.03
Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

TTE

Energy industry group

1.46

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
TTE: 1.46
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

Cameco (CCJ) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	CCJ	TTE
P/E Ratio (TTM)	108.03	8.76
P/S Ratio (TTM)	8.93	0.90
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	6.03	1.46
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	0.63%	7.25%