Seek Returns

CCJ vs. TPL: Cameco vs. Texas Pacific Land Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while TPL falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
Profile ItemCCJTPL
NameCameco CorporationTexas Pacific Land Corporation
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD18.79 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
TPL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
MetricCCJTPL
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%-14.10%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%16.13%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%13.42%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
TPL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
MetricCCJTPL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%49.74%
Beta (5Y)1.180.62
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-52.50%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M380.93K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and TPL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
MetricCCJTPL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.46-0.37
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.64-0.50

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 37.07% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for TPL.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

TPL

Energy industry group

37.07%

Max
53.85%
TPL
37.07%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 60.71% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

TPL

Energy industry group

60.71%

TPL
60.71%
Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 76.20% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% operates around its industry’s norm.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

TPL

Energy industry group

76.20%

TPL
76.20%
Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
MetricCCJTPL
ROE (TTM)5.68%37.07%
ROA (TTM)2.79%26.08%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%60.71%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%76.20%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%94.09%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 13.09% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 6.04%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
MetricCCJTPL
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%13.09%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%6.15%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%6.04%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%2.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 5.41 post current ratio above their industries’ typical mid-ranges — short-term liquidity appears comfortable, though unusually high readings can point to idle current assets.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

TPL

Energy industry group

5.41

TPL
5.41
Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.01 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

TPL

Energy industry group

0.01

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
TPL
0.01
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
MetricCCJTPL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.555.41
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.01
Net Debt / EBITDA0.19-0.44

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.86% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TPL

Energy industry group

0.86%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
TPL
0.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 27.42% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TPL

Energy industry group

27.42%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
TPL
27.42%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
MetricCCJTPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%0.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%27.42%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 32.00 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 is richer still, above its industry range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

TPL

Energy industry group

32.00

Max
39.54
TPL
32.00
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 19.41 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

TPL

Energy industry group

19.41

TPL
19.41
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 10.42 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

TPL

Energy industry group

10.42

TPL
10.42
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Texas Pacific Land (TPL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL)
MetricCCJTPL
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.0332.00
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.9319.41
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.0310.42
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%0.43%