Seek Returns

CCJ vs. IMO: Cameco vs. Imperial Oil Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while IMO falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
Profile ItemCCJIMO
NameCameco CorporationImperial Oil Limited
Country/RegionCanadaCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsIntegrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD58.92 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE American
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
IMO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCCJIMO
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%35.68%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%34.62%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%32.18%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
IMO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCCJIMO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%30.00%
Beta (5Y)1.180.58
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-29.72%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M573.33K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and IMO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCCJIMO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.461.05
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.641.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for IMO.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

IMO

Energy industry group

25.24%

Max
53.85%
IMO
25.24%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

IMO

Energy industry group

10.88%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
IMO
10.88%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

IMO

Energy industry group

21.36%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
IMO
21.36%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCCJIMO
ROE (TTM)5.68%25.24%
ROA (TTM)2.79%10.93%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%10.88%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%21.36%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%20.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCCJIMO
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%-7.42%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%-7.56%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%-28.24%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%-17.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

IMO

Energy industry group

1.30

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
IMO
1.30
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

IMO

Energy industry group

0.17

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
IMO
0.17
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCCJIMO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.551.30
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.17
Net Debt / EBITDA0.190.13

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IMO

Energy industry group

2.65%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
IMO
2.65%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IMO

Energy industry group

26.49%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
IMO
26.49%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCCJIMO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%26.49%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

IMO

Energy industry group

13.78

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
IMO
13.78
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

IMO

Energy industry group

1.06

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
IMO
1.06
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices even higher, above its industry range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

IMO

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
4.21
IMO
3.38
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Imperial Oil (IMO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Imperial Oil (IMO)
MetricCCJIMO
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.0313.78
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.931.06
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.033.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%9.90%