Seek Returns

CCJ vs. HAL: Cameco vs. Halliburton Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL) both fall under the Energy industry group, but CCJ is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
Profile ItemCCJHAL
NameCameco CorporationHalliburton Company
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD26.34 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
HAL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
MetricCCJHAL
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%18.66%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%-3.16%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%7.11%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
HAL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
MetricCCJHAL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%33.27%
Beta (5Y)1.180.77
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-54.01%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M10.27M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and HAL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
MetricCCJHAL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.460.43
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.640.64

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% and Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

HAL

Energy industry group

18.78%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
HAL
18.78%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

HAL

Energy industry group

8.90%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
HAL
8.90%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

HAL

Energy industry group

12.43%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
HAL
12.43%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
MetricCCJHAL
ROE (TTM)5.68%18.78%
ROA (TTM)2.79%7.23%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%8.90%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%12.43%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%14.83%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% and Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
MetricCCJHAL
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%-3.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%3.01%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%-47.00%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%-4.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

HAL

Energy industry group

2.02

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
HAL
2.02
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

HAL

Energy industry group

0.73

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
HAL
0.73
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
MetricCCJHAL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.552.02
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.73
Net Debt / EBITDA0.191.54

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HAL

Energy industry group

2.13%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
HAL
2.13%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HAL

Energy industry group

28.57%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
HAL
28.57%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
MetricCCJHAL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%2.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%28.57%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

HAL

Energy industry group

13.38

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
HAL
13.38
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

HAL

Energy industry group

1.17

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
HAL
1.17
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices above its benchmark range — CCJ looks rich relative to book.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

HAL

Energy industry group

2.37

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
HAL
2.37
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Halliburton (HAL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Halliburton (HAL)
MetricCCJHAL
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.0313.38
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.931.17
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.032.37
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%6.20%