CCEP vs. GIS: Coca-Cola Europacific Partners vs. General Mills Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) and General Mills (GIS) both fall under the Food, Beverage & Tobacco industry group, but CCEP is classified in Beverages while GIS is classified in Food Products.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative beta of -0.01, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) has a non-negative beta of 0.53.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative ROE of -10.50%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) reports 23.54%, ranking against industry peers normally.

General Mills (GIS) reports a negative net margin of -4.89%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) reports 9.35%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 13.40% and General Mills (GIS) at 15.24% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 2.27% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while General Mills (GIS) at -5.45% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 38.31% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while General Mills (GIS) at -103.90% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 0.89 and General Mills (GIS) at 0.70 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 1.39 and General Mills (GIS) at 1.82 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

General Mills (GIS) at 6.69% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 1.76% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, GIS the richer one.

Both Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 46.62% and General Mills (GIS) at 59.41% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) trades at 22.42 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while General Mills (GIS) has no P/E ratio this period.

General Mills (GIS) at 1.04 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 2.39 sits in the pricier quartile — CCEP costs more per dollar of sales.

General Mills (GIS) at 2.55 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) at 5.53 carries an above-peer premium to book — CCEP is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics