CBRS vs. MPWR: Cerebras Systems vs. Monolithic Power Systems Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) are both classified in the Semiconductors sub-industry within the broader Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) has been public since November 19, 2004, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Cerebras Systems (CBRS) listed only on May 14, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both CBRS and MPWR need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) earns 24.47% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Cerebras Systems (CBRS) has no ROE this period.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) reports a negative net margin of -75.27%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) reports 23.89%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) reports a negative operating margin of -264.97%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) reports 29.75%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 75.71% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 26.43% also sits in the top quartile.

Only one side can be read here: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) reports EPS growth of -64.85%, ranked against its industry; Cerebras Systems (CBRS) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 3.70 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 5.83 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 0.16 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) reports a yield of 0.67%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) reports a payout of 41.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) trades at 65.27 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Cerebras Systems (CBRS) has no P/E ratio this period.

Both look expensive on sales: Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 15.53 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 31.30 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 2.23 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile relative to book while Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 15.56 prices above its industry range — a wide valuation gap against assets.

Valuation Metrics