Seek Returns logo

CBRE vs. ESS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CBRE and ESS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that CBRE is a conventional stock, whereas ESS is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolCBREESS
Company NameCBRE Group, Inc.Essex Property Trust, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentResidential REITs
Market Capitalization46.46 billion USD18.27 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 10, 2004June 7, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CBRE and ESS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CBRE vs. ESS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCBREESS
5-Day Price Return-1.77%-0.66%
13-Week Price Return9.05%-6.94%
26-Week Price Return19.39%-13.73%
52-Week Price Return24.92%-9.75%
Month-to-Date Return-0.90%-1.19%
Year-to-Date Return18.93%-7.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.45M0.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.57M0.48M
3-Month Volatility24.67%24.67%
Beta1.370.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CBRE

12.96%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
20.58%
Q3
9.51%
Median
3.59%
Q1
0.57%
Min
-9.76%

In the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CBRE’s Return on Equity of 12.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ESS

14.44%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
17.50%
Q3
9.60%
Median
6.78%
Q1
3.88%
Min
-0.69%

In the upper quartile for the Residential REITs industry, ESS’s Return on Equity of 14.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CBRE

2.86%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
61.27%
Q3
26.17%
Median
9.35%
Q1
2.35%
Min
-23.71%

CBRE’s Net Profit Margin of 2.86% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ESS

43.51%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
53.28%
Q3
43.51%
Median
25.98%
Q1
9.99%
Min
-0.30%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CBRE

4.23%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.26%
Median
23.27%
Q1
7.24%
Min
-44.62%

CBRE’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.23% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ESS

52.69%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.66%
Q3
47.76%
Median
29.76%
Q1
18.99%
Min
-0.66%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCBREESS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.96%14.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.22%6.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.86%43.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.23%52.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)19.42%70.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CBRE

1.13

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
2.25
Median
1.48
Q1
1.00
Min
0.04

CBRE’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ESS

0.71

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.56
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

ESS’s Current Ratio of 0.71 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CBRE

0.90

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.85
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

CBRE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.90 is typical for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ESS

1.20

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.68
Min
0.28

ESS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Residential REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.20. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CBRE

6.21

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
29.35
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.32
Min
-3.02

CBRE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.21 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ESS

8.86

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.86, ESS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Residential REITs industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCBREESS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.130.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.090.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.901.20
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.218.86

Growth

Revenue Growth

CBRE vs. ESS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CBRE vs. ESS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CBRE

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.97%
Q3
3.55%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.48%
Min
0.00%

CBRE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ESS

3.75%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.67%
Q3
4.30%
Median
3.71%
Q1
3.53%
Min
3.04%

ESS’s Dividend Yield of 3.75% is consistent with its peers in the Residential REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CBRE

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
310.03%
Q3
143.62%
Median
62.44%
Q1
29.44%
Min
0.00%

CBRE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ESS

79.64%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
214.13%
Q3
138.72%
Median
103.63%
Q1
84.15%
Min
22.05%

ESS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.64% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCBREESS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%79.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CBRE

42.68

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.83
Q3
31.11
Median
15.41
Q1
11.32
Min
3.67

A P/E Ratio of 42.68 places CBRE in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ESS

21.23

Residential REITs Industry

Max
76.72
Q3
44.45
Median
28.89
Q1
22.94
Min
9.90

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CBRE

1.22

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.20
Q3
5.67
Median
2.73
Q1
0.97
Min
0.06

CBRE’s P/S Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ESS

9.24

Residential REITs Industry

Max
13.08
Q3
9.23
Median
7.38
Q1
6.12
Min
5.65

ESS’s P/S Ratio of 9.24 is in the upper echelon for the Residential REITs industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CBRE

5.06

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.20
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

At 5.06, CBRE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ESS

3.24

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.62
Median
2.08
Q1
1.46
Min
0.68

ESS’s P/B Ratio of 3.24 is in the upper tier for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CBRE vs. ESS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Residential REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCBREESS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)42.6821.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.229.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.063.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.7273.72