CBOE vs. WSE: Cboe Global Markets vs. Wise Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Wise (WSE) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CBOE is classified in Capital Markets while WSE is classified in Financial Services.

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) has been public since June 15, 2010 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while Wise (WSE) only listed on May 11, 2026 — long-window metrics on the WSE side should be interpreted with caution.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Wise (WSE) has an aggressive beta of 1.56, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is defensive at 0.35 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both CBOE and WSE need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% and Wise (WSE) at 27.23% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% and Wise (WSE) at 19.93% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Wise (WSE) at 59.77% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% and Wise (WSE) at 17.14% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and Wise (WSE) at -5.78% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Wise (WSE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Wise (WSE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Wise (WSE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports a yield of 0.86%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Wise (WSE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports a payout of 21.49%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Wise (WSE) at 23.23 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — CBOE needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Wise (WSE) at 4.30 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 sits in the pricier quartile — CBOE costs more per dollar of sales.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 and Wise (WSE) at 5.94 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics