CBOE vs. NLY: Cboe Global Markets vs. Annaly Capital Management Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CBOE is classified in Capital Markets while NLY is classified in Mortgage Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is an ordinary operating company, while Annaly Capital Management (NLY) is a REIT — read its payout ratio and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than comparing them directly to CBOE’s multiples.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 7.35% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CBOE.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 80.27% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 107.33% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 87.29% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 80.25% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NLY.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% pays an industry-typical yield; Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 15.38% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) reports payout ratio above 100% at 201.39%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports 21.49%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 13.02 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — CBOE needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Both look expensive on sales: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 10.62 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Annaly Capital Management (NLY) at 1.05 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics