CBOE vs. KSPI: Cboe Global Markets vs. Kaspi.kz Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Kaspi.kz (KSPI) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CBOE is classified in Capital Markets while KSPI is classified in Consumer Finance.

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) has been public since June 15, 2010, giving it a longer listed trading history, while Kaspi.kz (KSPI) listed on January 19, 2024 and still has a shorter public-market record.

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) trades as ordinary local shares, while Kaspi.kz (KSPI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% and Kaspi.kz (KSPI) at 44.78% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% and Kaspi.kz (KSPI) at 24.15% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Kaspi.kz (KSPI) at 0.00% operates in the bottom quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Kaspi.kz (KSPI) at 59.78% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for KSPI.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and Kaspi.kz (KSPI) at 2.96% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Kaspi.kz (KSPI) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Kaspi.kz (KSPI) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Kaspi.kz (KSPI) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports a yield of 0.86%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% and Kaspi.kz (KSPI) at 33.12% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Kaspi.kz (KSPI) at 8.40 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

A sales-based read is only available for Cboe Global Markets (CBOE), whose P/S ratio of 6.98 ranks against industry peers; Kaspi.kz (KSPI) reports no figure this period.

Kaspi.kz (KSPI) at 0.01 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.

Valuation Metrics