CBOE vs. IVZ: Cboe Global Markets vs. Invesco Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Invesco (IVZ) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CBOE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while IVZ falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Invesco (IVZ) has an aggressive beta of 1.65, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is defensive at 0.35 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Invesco (IVZ) reports a negative ROE of -0.58%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports 27.39%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Invesco (IVZ) reports a negative net margin of -1.10%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports 28.05%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% and Invesco (IVZ) at 23.30% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% and Invesco (IVZ) at 5.11% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Invesco (IVZ) at -235.59% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Invesco (IVZ) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Invesco (IVZ) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% and Invesco (IVZ) at 3.16% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% and Invesco (IVZ) at 56.46% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) trades at 25.14 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Invesco (IVZ) has no P/E ratio this period.

Invesco (IVZ) at 1.67 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 sits in the pricier quartile — CBOE costs more per dollar of sales.

Invesco (IVZ) at 1.18 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics